It might be possible to develop "realistic" models which explain these things if CoE is demoted from a law to a convention or should a law always take precedence over intelligibility and experience?
Harry On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 1:33 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint <[email protected]>wrote: > So, out of all the erudite Vorts, no one can answer the following simple > questions: > > Why are the UP-spin quarks on OPPOSITE sides of the proton from the > DOWN-spin quarks??? > > Why do... > "All spin directions collapse on one or the OPPOSITE direction depending > on > the measured photon polarization." ??? > > Why, in some nuclear interactions, do two gammas go shooting off in > OPPOSITE > directions??? > > Where is the physical model that explains the REASON for these basic > observations??? > > Why is the magnetic field PERPENDICULAR to the E-field??? > It's all related... > > -Mark (the reluctant hijackee) Iverson > > _____________________________________________ > From: Jones Beene [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 6:39 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [Vo]:A pile of clues... should be obvious by now! > > > There seems to be two different overlapping threads going on here, since > Mark's original suggestion relating to subatomic quark resonance was > hijacked (by moi) in favor of another related subject: "lack of gammas" in > LENR. Apologies for that. > > <deleted hijacker's msg since it's not answering my question :-)> > >
