Harry,
I am ok with COE remaining a law but the "convention" that HUP
can never be tapped needs to be stricken. My point is that the random forces
normally cancelled in the macro world become organized by casimir geometry and
can provide an exploitable bias from zero point energy.
Fran
From: Harry Veeder [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 2:48 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:A pile of clues... should be obvious by now!
It might be possible to develop "realistic" models which explain these things
if CoE is demoted from a law to a convention
or should a law always take precedence over intelligibility and experience?
Harry
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 1:33 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
So, out of all the erudite Vorts, no one can answer the following simple
questions:
Why are the UP-spin quarks on OPPOSITE sides of the proton from the
DOWN-spin quarks???
Why do...
"All spin directions collapse on one or the OPPOSITE direction depending on
the measured photon polarization." ???
Why, in some nuclear interactions, do two gammas go shooting off in OPPOSITE
directions???
Where is the physical model that explains the REASON for these basic
observations???
Why is the magnetic field PERPENDICULAR to the E-field???
It's all related...
-Mark (the reluctant hijackee) Iverson
_____________________________________________
From: Jones Beene [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 6:39 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [Vo]:A pile of clues... should be obvious by now!
There seems to be two different overlapping threads going on here, since
Mark's original suggestion relating to subatomic quark resonance was
hijacked (by moi) in favor of another related subject: "lack of gammas" in
LENR. Apologies for that.
<deleted hijacker's msg since it's not answering my question :-)>
