Axil says:
What is the difference between "connect the dots" and "conflate". I believe
it is spin.What gives you the license to "connect the dots" and then allows
you to accuse me of conflating a relationship between two experimental
results.
No one on this forum needs a license to try to promote cutting-edge
scientific discovery, nor to find hidden relationships if they are
historical, nor to challenge any conclusion that others make. But please do
so with facts or logic, not vague generalities. And do not expect you own
contentions to go unchallenged when they are so not supported by the
references cited, as with gamma thermalization. In fact I welcome your
challenges and that is one of the reasons I post here. If you are too
thin-skinned to welcome challenges from others, my suggestion is to go
elsewhere.
Correspondingly, I do not "accuse" you of anything other than occasionally
not understanding the papers you cite. Several times recently you have cited
papers that completely negate the point you were trying to make.
Deliberately conflating relationships which do not exist should always be
challenged, but instead of defending, or retracting, a silly error
(confusing a bosonic Josephson junction with a quasi-particle room
temperature BEC) you seem to want to respond with some kind of appeal to
unfairness.
I only connected two dots whereas you conflated six items some
rejected by science as invalid.
No, you did not connect any dots at all. You confused a bosonic Josephson
junction with a room temperature BEC (of quasiparticles) when in fact LENR
involves temperature way above room temperature and quasiparticles cannot
form Josephson junctions at all. You did this in order to promote an
outlandishly incorrect hypothesis that the BJJ is involved in
"thermalization of gammas" which is something that never happens to begin
with.
I want to see a specific experiment that explicitly shows such a direct
relationship between these six items before you are allowed to "connect the
dots".
What six items are you talking about? I am happy to address your concerns,
but note: if there was an obvious relationship in Rossi's previous work with
Petroldragon to the E-Cat, then someone would likely have seen it before now
- going on several years. At any rate, this was a suggestion and not a
claim.
IOW, I'm suggesting a possible historical connection, with the explicit
proviso of "if there was a thermal anomaly with Petroldragon" - which is a
bit different from promoting an absurdity - misquoting references, and then
whimpering that you are being treated unfairly.
Jones
