https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9h8zOKTZ6Y&playnext=1&list=PLFFCADC77D7CACDF8&feature=results_main
They say seeing is believing… The information used in my post came from this series of videos showing some Mills powder experiments. Should I believe you or my eyes. On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* Axil Axil **** > > ** ** > > Every LENR system including Mills nickel powder requires in some form or > another nuclear active sites (NAE) to produce heat. **** > > ** ** > > Wrong. Mills never used powder at all, for the first decade. There are no > NAE sites in his experiments. The Thermacore reactor for instance, used > nickel capillary tubing. Mills used electrolysis for most of his work. Had > you any knowledge of these things, or had you even read the literature - > you would not have exposed so much raw ignorance in one posting.**** > > Like other LENR systems Mills powder requires heat to start the LENR > reaction. **** > > Wrong. Mills first systems NEVER used input heat at all ! This is > unbelievably juvenile, Axil. Did you miss an entire decade of Mills’ > experiments?**** > > The modern BLP systems can use heat as input, or any number of other input > parameters besides heat. Mills first systems were electrolytic. Some of his > others used microwave input. Did you simply forget that, or did you never > know?**** > > And like other LENR systems, these nuclear active sites are destroyed; the > nickel powder must be completely reformulated to become active again. In > this reformulation process, the nuclear active sites are rebuilt.**** > > Wrong. There are no NAE sites in any Mills system. There is no need of > reformulation of nickel AFAIK.**** > > Thermacore ran a reactor for over one year - with gain for the whole time. > That fact alone destroyed your argument back going back to 1994, or did you > forget about Thermacore, like you forgot about electrolysis?**** > > Mills powder is just another LENR system that drives off of polaritons > working inside a nuclear active environment**** > > No. There are no polaritons in the typical Mills system. There is no > powder in most of his experiments and there is no NAE in any of them.**** > > Hydrinos are a fantasy inspired by a misunderstanding about the blue > shifting in spectroscopic data produced by polaritons.**** > > They may or may not be a fantasy, but Mills has attracted $80 million in > VC capital and few of his detractors have attracted as much attention – > good or bad. Instead they (you) seem to invest in such scams as the Papp > engine. Talk about gullible! Wow. How much has that fiasco cost you?**** > > All this fractional electron level nonsense is counterproductive and hurts > the prospects for the acceptance of LENR by main stream science.**** > > Mills has raised enough money so that he does not give a damn what > mainstream science thinks. That does not prove him correct, and he has been > a bigger disappointment to many of us than Rossi. But when you do not have > the tin cup out, and when have top notch credentials - it gives you a lot > of credibility with the man, i.e. the man (or woman) writing the checks.** > ** > > If this is quality commentary, you are mistaken. **** > > No – once again Axil does not have a clue, because he has failed to read > and understand the literature.**** > > I have had an open mind to in considering seriously the hydrino theory for > more than a year now but it is becoming increasingly tiresome.**** > > ** ** > > Who cares what you think after this amazing barrage of foolishness? **** > > ** ** > > When a commentator does not take the time to read the literature, his > comments will go overlooked, and I am unlikely to waste any more time > correcting your mistakes.**** > > ** ** > > Jones**** > > ** ** >
