From: Axil Axil
Every LENR system including Mills nickel powder requires in some form or
another nuclear active sites (NAE) to produce heat.
Wrong. Mills never used powder at all, for the first decade. There are no
NAE sites in his experiments. The Thermacore reactor for instance, used
nickel capillary tubing. Mills used electrolysis for most of his work. Had
you any knowledge of these things, or had you even read the literature - you
would not have exposed so much raw ignorance in one posting.
Like other LENR systems Mills powder requires heat to start the LENR
reaction.
Wrong. Mills first systems NEVER used input heat at all ! This is
unbelievably juvenile, Axil. Did you miss an entire decade of Mills'
experiments?
The modern BLP systems can use heat as input, or any number of other input
parameters besides heat. Mills first systems were electrolytic. Some of his
others used microwave input. Did you simply forget that, or did you never
know?
And like other LENR systems, these nuclear active sites are destroyed; the
nickel powder must be completely reformulated to become active again. In
this reformulation process, the nuclear active sites are rebuilt.
Wrong. There are no NAE sites in any Mills system. There is no need of
reformulation of nickel AFAIK.
Thermacore ran a reactor for over one year - with gain for the whole time.
That fact alone destroyed your argument back going back to 1994, or did you
forget about Thermacore, like you forgot about electrolysis?
Mills powder is just another LENR system that drives off of polaritons
working inside a nuclear active environment
No. There are no polaritons in the typical Mills system. There is no powder
in most of his experiments and there is no NAE in any of them.
Hydrinos are a fantasy inspired by a misunderstanding about the blue
shifting in spectroscopic data produced by polaritons.
They may or may not be a fantasy, but Mills has attracted $80 million in VC
capital and few of his detractors have attracted as much attention - good or
bad. Instead they (you) seem to invest in such scams as the Papp engine.
Talk about gullible! Wow. How much has that fiasco cost you?
All this fractional electron level nonsense is counterproductive and hurts
the prospects for the acceptance of LENR by main stream science.
Mills has raised enough money so that he does not give a damn what
mainstream science thinks. That does not prove him correct, and he has been
a bigger disappointment to many of us than Rossi. But when you do not have
the tin cup out, and when have top notch credentials - it gives you a lot of
credibility with the man, i.e. the man (or woman) writing the checks.
If this is quality commentary, you are mistaken.
No - once again Axil does not have a clue, because he has failed to read and
understand the literature.
I have had an open mind to in considering seriously the hydrino theory for
more than a year now but it is becoming increasingly tiresome.
Who cares what you think after this amazing barrage of foolishness?
When a commentator does not take the time to read the literature, his
comments will go overlooked, and I am unlikely to waste any more time
correcting your mistakes.
Jones
