Thanks for the reference, Jed. In that paper by Johnson, they quote Craven & Letts. Do you think it was this paper that National Instruments proceeds from when they reviewed the literature and cited more than 180 replications?
D. Craven and D. Letts, “The enabling criteria of electrochemical heat: beyond a reasonable doubt,” *Proc. 14th International Conference on Condensed Matter Nuclear Science (ICCF**14)* ** , Washington, D.C., August 10–15, 2008 National Instruments is a multibillion dollar corporation that does not need to stick its neck out for “bigfoot stories”. They recently concluded that after reviewing more than 180 replications, with so much evidence of anomalous heat generation... *http://www.22passi.it/downloads/eu_brussels_june_20_2012_concezzi.pdf*<http://www.22passi.it/downloads/eu_brussels_june_20_2012_concezzi.pdf> Conclusion • There is an unknown physical event and there is a need of better measurements and control tools. NI is playing a role in accelerating innovation and discovery. On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > > See also: > > Johnson, R and M. Melich. *Weight of Evidence for the Fleischmann-Pons > Effect*. in *ICCF-14 International* > *Conference on Condensed Matter Nuclear Science*. 2008. Washington, DC > > http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/JohnsonRweightofev.pdf > > - Jed > >
