Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> wrote:
> In that paper by Johnson, they quote Craven & Letts. Do you think it was > this paper that National Instruments proceeds from when they reviewed the > literature and cited more than 180 replications? > I do not know. However, that is approximately the number in Ed's book, Table 2. Studies reporting anomalous power production. Table 6 shows many "selected" studies with tritium. There is some overlap. I regard tritium as proof that a nuclear reaction occurred. It is as convincing as excess heat far beyond the limits of chemistry. It is easy for experts to confirm that tritium is real. This is another type of evidence that people such as Cude never address. - Jed
