Joe, let me clarify what Jones proposes. The glow discharge used by
Mizuno and others is actually a plasma discharge in an electrolytic
cell. This has produced detectable heat, but is has a limited lifetime
and requires complex analysis of the input power.
What is normally called glow discharge is created in a pure gas by
applying a high voltage. This method has been explored by many people
and also results in heat, tritium, and transmutation. Again, the
method has a short lifetime.
Both methods are more dangerous than the conventional electrolytic
method and require more expensive equipment. I have no favorite. It
all depends on your skill set and how much money you are willing to
spend.
Ed Storms
On May 14, 2013, at 11:17 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
Joe,
In terms of cost, safety, and likelihood of success, let me suggest
the glow
discharge CRF and not anything to do with palladium and deuterium.
There have been dozens of successful replications of the CFR - going
back to
Mizuno, including the two students seen here. Plus you can see
strong high
COP gain in tens of watts instead of milliwatts.
http://jlnlabs.online.fr/cfr/index.htm
Some of the vortex regulars may object, since they have so much time
and
effort tied up in palladium and deuterium, but IMHO - there is nothing
easier, safer and more likely to be successful than the Mizuno-style
CFR.
Jones
-----Original Message-----
From: Joseph S. Barrera III
If I want to try to reproduce it for myself:
1. What are the costs to get & set up the equipment?
2. Where do I find the best set of instructions?
- Joe
