Because when he DOES finally allow it, and its fine, people will look stupid. Its never what the magician tells you NOT to look at thats important, its what he tells you to look at.
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 1:00 AM, Robert Lynn <[email protected] > wrote: > This has only just occurred to me, but in my mind is a bit of a red flag: > > The reactor vessel is a sealed metal container, no electrical or magnetic > signal of any frequency will penetrate it (It is a faraday cage). And all > of the resistive heating elements are positioned around it, so they do > nothing but deliver heat to the reactor contents - no special magnetic or > electrical excitation can pass through the reactor vessel. All of these > configurational details were revealed to the testers by Rossi. > > So why did Rossi feel the need to prevent detailed analysis of the input > power to these resistors that are no more than resistive heaters? We know > he ran it in at least a partially pulsed 35% on 65% off mode with period of > about 6 minutes from the thermography. So what possible harm could have > come from allowing continuous measurement of voltage drop and current flow > through the resistors? > > As such preventing that measurement serves no sensible purpose that I, or > any other engineer/scientist could see, it is a pointless obfuscation. All > it achieves is raising suspicion about just what electrical power is really > flowing through those resistors. >
