"in cahoots with Rossi" translates into an international conspiracy once again. Are these skeptics now ready to go there?
Does anyone grasp the circularity of argument suggested here? Accept whatever observations fit your pet theory, ignore the rest and proclaim that you've uncovered the "real truth". Yet, there is no secure way to accept one reported detail over another in this mode of thought - like the parable of the blind man and the elephant, each sees what he wants. When the day comes that this mess is resolved ( and sea going vessels might be powered by a heat engine with the name "Rossi" on it), I hope this Day Lives In Infamy and is never forgotten - as a foremost example of how "science" works!
