Would you have us believe that the use of an oscilloscope and/or a spectrum 
analyzer was not forbidden for these tests? This has been discussed on this 
very forum just this week, and the opposite conclusion was drawn by the folks 
here.  Either it was forbidden, and what you write is misinformed, or you're 
correctly describing the situation, in which case the testers were not, in my 
view, as thorough as they ought to have been.

Andrew
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Jed Rothwell 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 7:18 AM
  Subject: Re: [Vo]:Ethics of the E-Cat investigation put into question


  Andrew <[email protected]> wrote:


    So this is an "independent test" in your book, when you freely acknowledge 
that Levi and Rossi have been friends and colleagues for a long time? 


  It is what it is. Call it independent, semi-independent, or a friendly visit. 
You can read the details in the report and judge for yourself. Some of the 
other participants have no connection to Rossi. That does not prevent them from 
knowing how to use instruments or comparing the IR camera readout to a 
thermocouple.


  I am a friend of Rossi. If I went there with my thermocopules, would you 
automatically dismiss my readings as well?



    And you see no hypocrisy when Rossi says that any equipment may be used, 
and then Levi constrains that . . .


  Levi DID NOT constrain that. You made that up! It is nonsense. I have been in 
contact with these researchers. They made it abundantly clear that neither 
Rossi nor Levi constrained them in any way. They agreed this was a reasonable 
set of instruments.


  They are of the opinion that Rossi and Levi have no magical ability to change 
the readout of a digital ammeter or an IR camera. I agree.



    (following perhaps dicta from Rossi)?


  No such dicta occurred. Rossi had no say in the matter. He did not know what 
meters they would bring, and he has no idea what they will bring next time. No 
one knows. That has not been decided yet. The whole point to doing multiple 
tests is to improve the instruments and techniques.


  Your saying "perhaps" does not make something true, or even likely.



    This all sits nice and comfy with you?


  Yes, absolutely.


  Your veiled and unfounded accusations do not sit nice and comfy with me.


  - Jed

Reply via email to