On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Joshua Cude <joshua.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Furthermore, the fact that it was predicted means it's not an > extraordinary claim at all. Everyone expected it. It fit a consistent > picture based on a century of robust experimental science. The 50 years was > spent developing tools to study it, not quarreling about whether someone > has already found it. > The science behind the higgs boson is conventional, but the higgs boson is an extraordinary entity because by today's standards it required an extraordinary feat of engineering to detect it. The Ecat is based on unconventional science, but by today's standards the Ecat is an ordinary feat of engineering. harry
