Unlike most if not all of the LENR faithful, I believe that LeClair has a powerful LENR system. The LeClair system produces so much power that nobody can think of it as a LENR system. They think that LENR must be weak.
I am coming to believe that LENR is a powerful energy concentration mechanism, where billions of coherent and entangled atoms can destroy the strong force inside a nucleus through the concentration of EMF. Nanospire has in fact created a supernova device. When a billion atoms share their energy in superposition, some cannot take the stress as induced by random fluctuations on vacuum energy. As energy is pumped into the condensate, the condensate wants to return to a lower energy state. Like radioactive decay, a certain number of atoms per unit time will drop out of the condensate and be subject to the full force of the combined energy potential of the entire condensate. This huge electric field is so great and its concentration is so sharp that the local space/time that encircles the atom dropping out of the condensate is distorted. In this way, the greatly amplified strength of the electroweak force reaches some appreciable fraction of the magnitude of the strong force. These two forces are on the road to unification. A quark–gluon plasma (QGP) or quark soup is formed at extremely high temperatures and/or density with an approximate temperature of 4 trillion degrees Celsius. This phase consists of asymptotically free quarks and gluons, which are several of the basic building blocks of matter. This quark soup will reform into atoms in new nuclear configurations like they would have done just after the big bang when the strong force and the electroweak force were going through a cooling process aka phase transition. Usually in LENR the gammas in this type of situation are thermalized, but in the LeClair system, the coupling constraint between the entangled concentrate members are not right for some reason, probably the low temperature of water is the cause. You can think of a Bose-Einstein condensate as a huge super-atom. If this superatom is excited and therefore unstable, it will decay radioactively. The decay products of this superatom are not fundamental particles but are remade atoms whose nuclei have been put through a quantum mechanical blender and then reformed by quark soup cooling. On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Joe Hughes <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry Axil it is unclear to me from your response which side you fall on > regarding nanospire and Leclair's work. > > Interesting article from a little while back regarding it: > > > http://pieeconomics.blogspot.com/p/cavitation-transmutation-take-this-viral.html > > > > > > Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > > Like most things in the perverse field of LENR, Sonoluminescence is > counter intuitive. The star in the bottle is impressive but that false > spark in the deep ultra-blue is a false trail to anything useful. > > The power that that spark wastes is turned outward. To be effective, the > plasmonic field must be turned inward in a dark mode to build in a cascade > of amplification. > > The cavitation bubble is one of the most powerful forms of power > concentration but such is its plight to be ordinary. > > The lust for gamma rays have been amply supplied by LeClair to such an > abundant extent that they as dangerous. > > And yet even the LENR faithful ignore LeClair’s results and he is not > supported in any way. > > It must be his bubbles; there just too plain and inconspicuous not like > the shining stars in the bottle. > > > > > On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 9:51 PM, Joe Hughes <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Interesting video clip featuring Dr. Seth Putterman describing his >> thoughts on "A star in a jar". >> >> Sorry if this had been posted and i missed it. Been hard to keep up with >> the list lately. :) >> >> This is a clip from a longer BBC video i believe. >> >> http://youtu.be/LWO93G-zLZ0 >> >> >> >> >> >
