So why would you want to buy three tons of coal to generate electricity if only one ton were needed? Rossi has pointed out on several occasions that his device will operate with gas heating. Would you prefer to put out that extra carbon dioxide and pay the extra cost for the coal if you had an ECAT that tripled your energy supply?
I prefer the many options that open when the COP is 6, but that does not mean that a COP of 3 is not important. You should know better than to make these kinds of statements. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Joshua Cude <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Tue, Jun 4, 2013 7:19 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:A Couple Hundred Bucks Maybe... On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: If the device cannotself-power, it is still valuable with a lower COP, the proverbial hot water orspace heater - A COP of 3 is not useful if the electricity was made with fossil fuels at an efficiency of 1/3. That's a wash.
