I'm saying that BEC is known to form near absolute zero but has not been shown to form BETWEEN ATOMS at higher temperatures. People have PROPOSED BEC formation at high temperature between energy states but this has not been fully demonstrated or shown to apply to atoms.

My approach is to ask what would be the consequence if we ASSUME the BEC actually forms in PdD. The consequence leads to logical conflict, which has not been resolved. I'm asking you or someone to resolve this conflict.

Ed I'm
On Jun 11, 2013, at 11:56 PM, Kevin O'Malley wrote:

Now, wait a second. After responding to this and seeing your lack of response, then repeating the same thing on another thread it leads me to re-examine what you wrote. Perhaps you are saying here that near-zero BECs have formed in Metal Hydrides? If so, then how can you say on the other thread

Why invoke a structure that is known not to form at high temperature?
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg82949.html

Then that means BECs have been known to form in metal hydrides, or you are pretending like we never had this conversation about BECs forming at high temperatures. Which is it? Or perhaps there's an in-between thing I'm overlooking, that no doubt would save face for one or both of us?

On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Edmund Storms <[email protected]> wrote: Kevin, I see no evidence in the link for the actual existence of a BEC forming between hydrons at room temperature. People have proposed but not demonstrated.

Ed Storms

On May 27, 2013, at 4:53 PM, Kevin O'Malley wrote:


On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Edmund Storms <[email protected] > wrote:

The BEC is known from experience and theory to only form near absolute zero.
***How quickly you forget having logged onto this thread:

Re: [Vo]:Bose Einstein Condensate formed at Room Temperature
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg76596.html

And this thread was greeted with a yawn:
[Vo]:Re: Superheated Bose-Einstein condensate exists above critical temperature
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg78827.html





Reply via email to