On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Edmund Storms <[email protected]>wrote:

> I'm saying that BEC is known to form near absolute zero but has not been
> shown to form BETWEEN ATOMS at higher temperatures.
>
***Is an optically trapped potassium-39 gas somehow not formed of ATOMS?
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg78827.html




> People have PROPOSED BEC formation at high temperature between energy
> states but this has not been fully demonstrated or shown to apply to atoms.
>
>
> My approach is to ask what would be the consequence if we ASSUME the BEC
> actually forms in PdD.  The consequence leads to logical conflict, which
> has not been resolved. I'm asking you or someone to resolve this conflict.
>
> Ed I'm
>
> On Jun 11, 2013, at 11:56 PM, Kevin O'Malley wrote:
>
> Now, wait a second.  After responding to this and seeing your lack of
> response, then repeating the same thing on another thread it leads me to
> re-examine what you wrote.  Perhaps you are saying here that near-zero BECs
> have formed in Metal Hydrides?  If so, then how can you say on the other
> thread
>
> Why invoke a structure that is known not to form at high temperature?
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg82949.html
>
> Then that means BECs have been known to form in metal hydrides, or you are
> pretending like we never had this conversation about BECs forming at high
> temperatures.  Which is it?  Or perhaps there's an in-between thing I'm
> overlooking, that no doubt would save face for one or both of us?
>
> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Edmund Storms <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Kevin, I see no evidence in the link for the actual existence of a BEC
>> forming between hydrons at room temperature. People have proposed but not
>> demonstrated.
>>
>> Ed Storms
>>
>> On May 27, 2013, at 4:53 PM, Kevin O'Malley wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Edmund Storms <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>> The BEC is known from experience and theory to only form near absolute
>> zero.
>> ***How quickly you forget having logged onto this thread:
>>
>> Re: [Vo]:Bose Einstein Condensate formed at Room 
>> Temperature<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]&q=subject:%22Re%3A+%5BVo%5D%3ABose+Einstein+Condensate+formed+at+Room+Temperature%22>
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg76596.html
>>
>> And this thread was greeted with a yawn:
>> [Vo]:Re: Superheated Bose-Einstein condensate exists above critical
>> temperature<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]&q=subject:%22%5BVo%5D%3ARe%3A+Superheated+Bose-Einstein+condensate+exists+above+critical+temperature%22>
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg78827.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to