No I did not read it because you have to pay money for it. http://www.nature.com/nphys/journal/v9/n5/full/nphys2587.html
I do have to admit that I misread the article, there's a graph showing -10, 0 , +10 and +30 in what appears to be a temperature axis, but its labelling is quizzical. I had thought when I read it that this meant room temperature, i.e. in degrees celsius. Now I don't know what is intended for that axis. On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > Did you read the paper cited in the post, Kevin?**** > > ** ** > > If so, then what temperature are we talking about?**** > > ** ** > > Is that temperature not “near absolute zero” as Ed states?**** > > ** ** > > QED**** > > ** ** > > *From:* Kevin O'Malley **** > > ** ** > > Edmund Storms wrote:**** > > I'm saying that BEC is known to form near absolute zero but has not been > shown to form BETWEEN ATOMS at higher temperatures.**** > > ** ** > > ***Is an optically trapped potassium-39 gas somehow not formed of ATOMS? > **** > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg78827.html**** > > **** > > ** ** > > ** ** >
