Wire Dimensions:
220micron diameter
20micron active layer
100cm
1m*pi*220um*20um?mm^3
([{1 * meter} * pi] * [220 * {micro*meter}]) * (20 * [micro*meter]) ?
(milli*met
er)^3
= 13.823007 mm^3
Excess power:
2.5W
1m*pi*220um*20um;2.5W?W/cm^3
([{(1 * meter) * pi} * {220 * (micro*meter)}] * [20 * {micro*meter}])^-1 *
(2.5
* watt) ? watt / ([centi*meter]^3)
= 180.85789 W/cm^3
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 2:05 PM, H Veeder <[email protected]> wrote:
> Today (June 26, 2013)...
>
>
>
> http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/follow/follow-2/295-simultaneous-test-runs-eu-us
>
>
> Update 18:15 UTC -
>
> Both the EU Cells and the US Cells were switched on and BOTH indicated
> excess energy as the cells came to equilibrium at higher temperatures than
> during the calibration tests. The EU cell with the active wire was
> indicating up to 2.5W of excess power over the 30.4W input power (~6%
> excess). That is well above the 95% confidence limits for that cell
> (~0.25W). The US Cell was indicating approximately 1.4 watts excess,
> again, well above the ~0.5W confidence interval. Very exciting to see
> something positive and especially simultaneous.
>
> The indicated excess seems to be corroborated by several cell temperatures
> higher than calibration values. The control cells in each location are
> performing at or below calibration values.
>
> The internal cell temperatures seem to be slowly degrading, but the
> external cell temperatures are holding steady.
>
> The resistance of the active wires is slowly rising as, presumably, the
> hydrogen is leaving into the vacuum.
>
> The EU cell has been cycled already, leading to the the active wire
> "unloading" and rising up to a higher resistance than the wire had
> originally.
>
