So, as I understand from the data [1] over the test runs the US cell saw a gain of about 4.9% (1.49W/30.25W) and the EU Cell saw about 6.1% (1.82W/30.05W).
[mg] [1] http://data.hugnetlab.com/ On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 4:43 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi MarkG,**** > > No, you’re not missing anything… a control cell producing some small > amount of heat would result in a **conservative** (i.e., lower) estimate > of power generated in the test cell… assuming that the test cell is at > least several sigma above the control cell so experimental uncertainty was > not a reasonable explanation for the excess.**** > > -Mark I**** > > ** ** > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Mark > Gibbs > *Sent:* Wednesday, June 26, 2013 4:31 PM > > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:MFMP cells in Europe and US now showing signs of > excess heat**** > > ** ** > > Am I missing something here? Surely if the control cell is producing some > small amount of energy from an LENR process due to contamination but it's > less than that being produced by the experimental cell then while a > baseline might be hard or even impossible to establish wouldn't a > significant power gain be detectable and verifiable?**** > > ** ** > > [mg]**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 3:55 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint <[email protected]> > wrote:**** > > Jones' point about ANY exposure to H is acknowledged... > > That being said, does anyone know the exact procedure by which the material > in the control cell was prepared and the cell assembled??? Obviously, the > nichrome wire was shipped to them, but was it exposed to air (humid air > will > supply plenty of H)? How were the cells assembled?? I can't imagine that > they were somehow assembled in a vacuum; perhaps in an inert gaseous > environment?? > > -Mark**** > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Akira Shirakawa [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 3:47 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Vo]:MFMP cells in Europe and US now showing signs of excess > heat**** > > On 2013-06-27 00:42, Jones Beene wrote: > > > Whether or not nickel-hydride with 7% by atomic volume hydrogen will > > give much net gain is debatable - but the lack of hydrogen gas in the > > cell after vacuum purge may not be enough for a good control (if the > > nichrome was previously alloyed with hydrogen). > > The control cells have not been exposed to hydrogen yet. Are you suggesting > that they might have been, inadvertently? > > Cheers, > S.A. > > **** > > ** ** >
