http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journal_ranking
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impact_factor How about using something like that? It has to have some minimum impact factor? How about an impact factor of at least 15? On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ok, I posted it at the forum Intrade Gateway. We'll see if anyone is > willing. > > > > http://intrade.freeforums.org/re-anyone-willing-to-make-a-bet-the-ecat-is-not-real-t31.html > > How would we come to an agreement on which publications are acceptable? I > can see why you wouldn't want Journal of Nuclear Physics. But throwing out > American Chemical Society? Where's the legitimate cutoff point? > > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 5:03 PM, blaze spinnaker <blazespinna...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> Ahhh, action. I love it! >> >> A peer reviewed publication, that's very interesting. I think we'll >> need to define which publications that might be, but other than that I'm in >> if you are. >> >> As for someone to hold it, maybe we can post on intrade.freeforums.orgfor >> someone to hold it. Or who knows, maybe someone here might hold it >> (Paypal?) >> >> Glad to see you around! Really really miss intrade (obviously!) >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Hello Blaze. I'm very pleased to see you posting here on Vortex. You >>> may remember me on Intrade as ko, the guy who kept posting Cold Fusion >>> articles. And I won quite a bit of money when the contract I posted was >>> verified by Carl. >>> >>> So, yes. I'm very interested in such a bet. In particular I like the >>> 10:1 odds. But we need to find an unbiased 3rd party to hold the money >>> and make the decision. Who would that be, now that Intrade is defunct? >>> >>> Also, the parameters of the decision are different than I would settle >>> upon. I don't hold Gibbs all that high in esteem. >>> >>> Perhaps something like, the 7 scientists who verified the energy density >>> of the Ecat get their paper published in a peer reviewed publication? >>> >>> >>> >>> How I Made Money from Cold Fusion >>> Saturday, January 23, 2010 12:28:49 PM · by Kevmo · 28 replies · 1,013+ >>> views >>> Exclusive Article for Free Republic | 1/23/10 | Kevmo >>> http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2435697/posts >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 4:37 PM, blaze spinnaker < >>> blazespinna...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> As a possible set of parameters to this bet: >>>> >>>> I'm willing to bet my 5000 against anyone's 500 that Mark Gibbs doesn't >>>> publish an article in Forbes this year that states he personally believes >>>> without a doubt that LENR+ is real and has a power density matching what >>>> Levi/Essen published (within some reasonable margin of error). >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 3:27 PM, blaze spinnaker < >>>> blazespinna...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Is anyone willing here to bet me $$$ that the eCat will not be proven >>>>> this year? >>>>> >>>>> I'm open to discussing the parameters of this bet. Ideally we'd >>>>> mutually agree on a 3rd party to hold our money and be an impartial judge >>>>> as to who wins by EOY. >>>>> >>>>> Let me know. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> >>>>> Blaze. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
