So far I can't get a handle on what Impact Factor really is. Reuters charges for their information. I need to see where various journals are in this ranking, such as Naturewieessen, American Chemical Society, Journal of Analytical Chemistry, Physics Letters A, Journal of Nuclear Physics,Nature, Journal of Electrochemistry and various other journals. In particular, I would like to know the rankings of the journals mentioned on page 18 in this paper from Jed Rothwell's LENR-CANR.org website:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RothwellJtallyofcol.pdf On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 5:26 PM, blaze spinnaker <[email protected]>wrote: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journal_ranking > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impact_factor > > How about using something like that? It has to have some minimum impact > factor? > > How about an impact factor of at least 15? > > > > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Ok, I posted it at the forum Intrade Gateway. We'll see if anyone is >> willing. >> >> >> >> http://intrade.freeforums.org/re-anyone-willing-to-make-a-bet-the-ecat-is-not-real-t31.html >> >> How would we come to an agreement on which publications are acceptable? >> I can see why you wouldn't want Journal of Nuclear Physics. But throwing >> out American Chemical Society? Where's the legitimate cutoff point? >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 5:03 PM, blaze spinnaker < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Ahhh, action. I love it! >>> >>> A peer reviewed publication, that's very interesting. I think we'll >>> need to define which publications that might be, but other than that I'm in >>> if you are. >>> >>> As for someone to hold it, maybe we can post on intrade.freeforums.orgfor >>> someone to hold it. Or who knows, maybe someone here might hold it >>> (Paypal?) >>> >>> Glad to see you around! Really really miss intrade (obviously!) >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Hello Blaze. I'm very pleased to see you posting here on Vortex. You >>>> may remember me on Intrade as ko, the guy who kept posting Cold Fusion >>>> articles. And I won quite a bit of money when the contract I posted was >>>> verified by Carl. >>>> >>>> So, yes. I'm very interested in such a bet. In particular I like the >>>> 10:1 odds. But we need to find an unbiased 3rd party to hold the money >>>> and make the decision. Who would that be, now that Intrade is defunct? >>>> >>>> Also, the parameters of the decision are different than I would settle >>>> upon. I don't hold Gibbs all that high in esteem. >>>> >>>> Perhaps something like, the 7 scientists who verified the energy >>>> density of the Ecat get their paper published in a peer reviewed >>>> publication? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> How I Made Money from Cold Fusion >>>> Saturday, January 23, 2010 12:28:49 PM · by Kevmo · 28 replies · 1,013+ >>>> views >>>> Exclusive Article for Free Republic | 1/23/10 | Kevmo >>>> http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2435697/posts >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 4:37 PM, blaze spinnaker < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> As a possible set of parameters to this bet: >>>>> >>>>> I'm willing to bet my 5000 against anyone's 500 that Mark Gibbs >>>>> doesn't publish an article in Forbes this year that states he personally >>>>> believes without a doubt that LENR+ is real and has a power density >>>>> matching what Levi/Essen published (within some reasonable margin of >>>>> error). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 3:27 PM, blaze spinnaker < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Is anyone willing here to bet me $$$ that the eCat will not be proven >>>>>> this year? >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm open to discussing the parameters of this bet. Ideally we'd >>>>>> mutually agree on a 3rd party to hold our money and be an impartial judge >>>>>> as to who wins by EOY. >>>>>> >>>>>> Let me know. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> >>>>>> Blaze. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
