I wouldn't be surprised if this compound nanowire produced some LENR
activity in the absence of hydrogen went temperatures got above 400C.

The silver would be replaced with nickel, however.

http://www.upenn.edu/pennnews/news/penn-researchers-use-nanoplasmonic-whispering-gallery-break-emission-time-record-semiconductors


On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Roarty, Francis X <[email protected]
> wrote:

>  Hi Mark,****
>
>                 Ok not cavities. Are you saying these internal
> oscillatory frequencies of reactants change at different rates when
> raising OR lowering the temperature such that you can hit upon a common
>  temperature where they oscillate at the same or harmonic of each other?
> Still waiting for someone to put all the pieces together nicely but am
> seeing where this phenomena really is a perfect storm of balanced
> temperatures and resonances. Makes me wonder about the waveform used by
> Rossi again, does the IR freq of heaters shift a little or only  pwm of the
> same frequency?  IOW is the pwm being used to fine tune an exact freq
> needed by the plasmons .. If I understand the conjecture this linkage
> between IR and plasmon then enables the next coupling between the plasmon
> electron waves and photons above the wave surface.  Also, I don’t know if
> this is supposed to be interfacing directly with the odd spectrum blue
> light or is there yet another step..I know Axil and Jones mentioned silicon
> carbide as likely target for plasmon resonance but there doesn’t seem to be
> a consensus on whether or how long fractional hydrogen can continue to
> exist once it leaves the Ni geometry that allows it to form. It would be
> nice to see the interface immediately since plasmons have this photonic
> ability but if not then what is the missing step?  Anybody>****
>
> Fran   ****
>
> *From:* MarkI-ZeroPoint [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Monday, July 01, 2013 12:34 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:Of Reaction Rate and Resonances...****
>
> ** **
>
> Mornin’ Fran,****
>
> ** **
>
> If you’re referring to Casimir cavities, then no.  ****
>
> In this thread, I’m not thinking about NAEs or dislocations, but simply
> bulk matter (the referenced PhysOrg paper was methanol and an oxidant
> injected as very cold gasses, IIRC)… ****
>
> ** **
>
> Hard to put into words, but changing the temperature of two substances
> changes their internal oscillatory frequencies, but NOT by the same
> amount.  Thus, as one adds (or REMOVES) heat, the two substances diverge
> further away from being in resonance… continue the process and their
> internal oscillatory frequencies will begin to converge and come into
> resonance.  Unless you know the **exact** temperature are which the
> resonance occurs, you’d go right past it and never see anything unusual…
> ergo, the laws for bulk matter.  That’s why these scientists were so
> surprised at the 50x enhancement of reaction rates since the laws of bulk
> matter are incomplete.****
>
> ** **
>
> "If our results continue to show a similar increase in the reaction rate
> at very cold temperatures, then scientists have been severely
> underestimating the rates of formation and destruction of complex
> molecules, such as alcohols, in space”****
>
> ** **
>
> -Mark****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* francis [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>]
> *Sent:* Monday, July 01, 2013 7:04 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* re: [Vo]:Of Reaction Rate and Resonances...****
>
> ** **
>
> I KEEP SAYING, ITS ALL ABOUT RESONANCES. ****
>
> ** **
>
> Mark, so a lower temp correlates to a larger cavity? I am trying to imagine 
> this but sticking on heat sinking vs heat emission, can heat sinking have a 
> resonance where it sinks better? 50 times better? I like the concept but is 
> there any foundation?****
>
> Fran****
>
> ** **
>
>  ****
>
> ** **
>
> First, this will also tie in with Harry Veeder's posting earlier today****
>
> titled:****
>
> ** **
>
>    Subject: "[Vo]:MFMP and phonon resonance temperature of Cu"****
>
> ** **
>
>  ****
>
> ** **
>
> Here is the link to the article that is 'Yet Another Clue':****
>
> ** **
>
>  "The quantum secret to alcohol reactions in space"****
>
> ** **
>
> http://phys.org/news/2013-06-quantum-secret-alcohol-reactions-space.html****
>
> ** **
>
>  ****
>
> ** **
>
> "Chemists have discovered that an 'impossible' reaction at cold 
> temperatures****
>
> actually occurs with vigour, which could change our understanding of how****
>
> alcohols are formed and destroyed in space.  To explain the impossible, 
> the****
>
> researchers propose that a quantum mechanical phenomenon, known as 
> 'quantum****
>
> tunnelling', is revving up the chemical reaction. ****
>
> ** **
>

Reply via email to