"Are you saying these internal oscillatory frequencies of reactants change
at different *rates* when raising OR lowering the temperature such that you
can hit upon a common temperature where they oscillate at the same or
harmonic of each other?"

 

EXACTLY.

Your regurgitation of what I was trying to describe sounds sooo much better!


J

 

The problem is that the point where the internal oscillatory frequencies
come into resonance is VERY specific and SHARP (very high Q-factor), thus,
if you don't know what those temps are, you're likely to *never* encounter
them and what you see is 'bulk' behavior consistent with current laws of
physics. 

 

"IOW, is the pwm being used to fine tune an exact freq needed by the
plasmons?"

 

Don't limit it to just plasmons!!

Does not any solid matter have plasmon/polariton/phonon oscillations going
on.

 

Each of these involve different aspects of the matter/lattice, and at
different scales.  Phonon (mechanical) oscillations may be affected by not
only the lattice dimensions and bond strength, but also by the overall
dimensions of the sample - what happens when there is a harmonic
relationship between the lattice geometry/bonds and the thickness of the
sample. and if considering a sample in 3D, what if there is a harmonic
relationship between the phononic oscillations in ALL 3 dimensions and the
dimensions/bonding strength between lattice atoms???  Is the phonon velocity
and damping the same is all three dimensions???? To say that this kind of
resonant condition would be very rare is an understatement!   But when it
does happen, I'll bet that current laws DO NOT APPLY.

 

I don't know enough about each to speak intelligently, but this is a key
question which perhaps someone more knowledgeable might be able to answer:

- Does coupling of E from one type of oscillator to another (e.g., from
plasmon to phonon) require them to come into a harmonic condition/resonance?
My guess is YES.  THE USUAL condition is that E is much more likely to
couple between LIKE oscillators, but that it *CAN* couple to dislike
oscillators if the right conditions are present.  This would explain why the
brute force nuclear reactions always generate daughter particle(s) +
energetic *photons* which escape the material.  Conditions are not such that
the energy gets coupled into the lattice (phonons/polaritons). But if that
harmonic relationship can be established, then the E would couple into the
lattice as in LENR.

 

Things to keep in mind are that there are physical oscillations which depend
on physical dimensions, both overall and inter-atomic, and on bond strength;
as well as NON-physical oscillators, such as a photon, since it isn't a
physical thing.  What is the transfer function between an IR photon and a
phonon oscillation???  IF conditions are such that there is a coupling
between IR photons and phonon oscillations, will the amount of E in a single
IR photon be even enough to cause any signif diff in the phonon
oscillations, and if so, would it be constructive or destructive
interference??  The YouTube vids of acoustic vibrations of corn-starch show
just how diverse and dramatic resonances can be.

 

As to the rest of your posting, Jones, Axil and you are further down that
rabbit hole than I, so I probably can't contribute much in detail.

 

-Mark

 

From: Roarty, Francis X [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 11:11 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Of Reaction Rate and Resonances...

 

Hi Mark,

                Ok not cavities. Are you saying these internal oscillatory
frequencies of reactants change at different rates when raising OR lowering
the temperature such that you can hit upon a common  temperature where they
oscillate at the same or harmonic of each other?  Still waiting for someone
to put all the pieces together nicely but am seeing where this phenomena
really is a perfect storm of balanced temperatures and resonances. Makes me
wonder about the waveform used by Rossi again, does the IR freq of heaters
shift a little or only  pwm of the same frequency?  IOW is the pwm being
used to fine tune an exact freq needed by the plasmons .. If I understand
the conjecture this linkage between IR and plasmon then enables the next
coupling between the plasmon electron waves and photons above the wave
surface.  Also, I don't know if this is supposed to be interfacing directly
with the odd spectrum blue light or is there yet another step..I know Axil
and Jones mentioned silicon carbide as likely target for plasmon resonance
but there doesn't seem to be a consensus on whether or how long fractional
hydrogen can continue to exist once it leaves the Ni geometry that allows it
to form. It would be nice to see the interface immediately since plasmons
have this photonic ability but if not then what is the missing step?
Anybody>

Fran   

From: MarkI-ZeroPoint [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 12:34 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:Of Reaction Rate and Resonances...

 

Mornin' Fran,

 

If you're referring to Casimir cavities, then no.  

In this thread, I'm not thinking about NAEs or dislocations, but simply bulk
matter (the referenced PhysOrg paper was methanol and an oxidant injected as
very cold gasses, IIRC). 

 

Hard to put into words, but changing the temperature of two substances
changes their internal oscillatory frequencies, but NOT by the same amount.
Thus, as one adds (or REMOVES) heat, the two substances diverge further away
from being in resonance. continue the process and their internal oscillatory
frequencies will begin to converge and come into resonance.  Unless you know
the *exact* temperature are which the resonance occurs, you'd go right past
it and never see anything unusual. ergo, the laws for bulk matter.  That's
why these scientists were so surprised at the 50x enhancement of reaction
rates since the laws of bulk matter are incomplete.

 

"If our results continue to show a similar increase in the reaction rate at
very cold temperatures, then scientists have been severely underestimating
the rates of formation and destruction of complex molecules, such as
alcohols, in space"

 

-Mark

 

From: francis [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 7:04 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: re: [Vo]:Of Reaction Rate and Resonances...

 

I KEEP SAYING, ITS ALL ABOUT RESONANCES. 
 
Mark, so a lower temp correlates to a larger cavity? I am trying to imagine
this but sticking on heat sinking vs heat emission, can heat sinking have a
resonance where it sinks better? 50 times better? I like the concept but is
there any foundation?
Fran
 
 
 
First, this will also tie in with Harry Veeder's posting earlier today
titled:
 
   Subject: "[Vo]:MFMP and phonon resonance temperature of Cu"
 
 
 
Here is the link to the article that is 'Yet Another Clue':
 
 "The quantum secret to alcohol reactions in space"
 
http://phys.org/news/2013-06-quantum-secret-alcohol-reactions-space.html
 
 
 
"Chemists have discovered that an 'impossible' reaction at cold temperatures
actually occurs with vigour, which could change our understanding of how
alcohols are formed and destroyed in space.  To explain the impossible, the
researchers propose that a quantum mechanical phenomenon, known as 'quantum
tunnelling', is revving up the chemical reaction. 

 

Reply via email to