Or, conversely, he's setting it all up for someone else to be responsible for this massive fraud as he tries to detach himself from the entire enterprise.
I wouldn't be surprised if we start hearing things like "well, the timeline is up to my partner CEO. I'm not sure what my partner CEO is doing. You'd have to ask him what's going on, unfortunately, I can't share his information with you." etc etc On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Craig <[email protected]> wrote: > Excellent news! Rossi's technology is spreading on his terms, with his > contracts, apparently without a US or European patent. > > Craig > > On 07/09/2013 01:31 PM, Alan Fletcher wrote: > > Andrea Rossi > > July 8th, 2013 at 10:25 PM > > http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=810&cpage=2#comment-734612 > > > > > > Eugenio Mieli: > > I already answered to your questions: please see my answers on July 3rd > and July 4th 2013. > > Please read carefully those answers: > > > > 1- The E-Cat technology is undergoing rigorous testing and the results- > positive, negative, or inconclusive- will provide further guidance about > its potential > > > > 2- We have great hopes for the E-Cat and what it can accomplish, and I > am pleased about the findings of the other scientists who have participated > in evaluating it so far. As this technology is still in the development > stage and undergoing rigorous review, I want to allow the continued process > of testing our technology to determine its potential and its uses. I am > pleased with our progress to date and I will share more as our work > continues. > > > > AND HERE IS AN UPDATE OF TODAY, JULY 8TH: > > The past three days have been holidays for most, but for us have been a > tremendous period of work during which we made a historic page for what > concerns our tech: for the first time, an E-Cat module, entirely produced > by our USA Partner in the new factory ( a magnificence), charged with the > charge made by the Partner’s CEO, using the materials we teached to buy, > prepare,manipulate, treat, to make the charges, assembled , insulated, has > started its operation, and the results are the same of the E-Cats built by > us. This event means that for the first time an E-Cat not built by me, not > controlled by me and not charged by me, not tested in my factory, but > manufactured from third parties upon our instructions and know how has > worked properly. This is the first unit of the plant that will give to the > factory of our USA Partner all its necessary thermal energy, and is also > the school ship for the employees. It is very important that it has been > completely made by the Customer, not by me: it is the first of millions, > but the first is always special. We celebrated with Coca Cola ( alcohol is > forbidden in that factory). All the former plants, even if built in the > USA, had been supplied with reactors cores made by me, so this is a very > important step. > > > > 3- Technological development can require a long process, involving many > changes as a technology moves forward. E-Cat is undergoing that process > now. This process will continue as long as needed, until such time as the > team believes the technology is able to fulfill its promise in commercial > settings. > > > > 4- E-Cat is still also in a phase of R&D, as I continue this work more > findings will be released and additional technical information will be > provided once practicable. As I focus on continuing my research, I will not > be able to respond to each specific question. > > Warm Regards, > > A.R. > > > > - - - > > > > Arthur B.: > > You are right: the Factory will be totally supplied by the E-Cats for > all the necessary thermal energy, starting this year. > > Warm Regards, > > A.R. > > > > [ Note : If he's "The Chief Scientist" and "the charge made by the > Partner’s CEO" ... it seems unlikely that the USA Partner is a big or > well-known company. ] > > > > > > > > > > >
