blaze spinnaker <blazespinna...@gmail.com> wrote: To be clear, obviously I do not know which. However, until the eCat is > fully in the public eye I don't think anyone can authoritatively say either > way, and I think it's a bit irresponsible trying to do so (negative or > positive).
My point exactly. It is a bit irresponsible when you write: ". . . he's setting it all up for someone else to be responsible for this massive fraud as he tries to detach himself from the entire enterprise." This is not a big deal. There are hundreds of people out there saying bad things about Rossi. Heck, there is a web site devoted to it. Plus that wacky paper by Ericsson and Pomp. Rossi invites that kind of attack by acting squirrely. Still . . . unless you have evidence of fraud maybe you should follow your own advice here. What you wrote causes no harm. But I find it disagreeable, because I have been hearing over and over and OVER for 20 years about every cold fusion scientist is a fraud. I get sick of it. You are beating a dead horse. We know you think that. We don't care, and we don't want to hear it. - Jed
