Dear Blaze For a successful third party test it is necessary to have a good, smart, well instructed 3rd party.Too much depends on the professional quality/skills of the 3rd party I think the publicly available product. Peter
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:49 AM, blaze spinnaker <[email protected]>wrote: > Very well said, Peter. > > I think it's easy to underestimate how intimidating it is to go on a > globally streamed demonstration like this in front of your peers and to do > that well unless you are deeply confident in what you are showing. > > Anyways, I do agree however that this was a demo and not a public 3rd > party test signed off by employed academics with careers at stake. For > all that Rossi annoys the heck out of me, he did at least orchestrate that. > > Personally, the milestones I'm now looking for are (in order of desire): > > 1. Publicly available product > 2. A generally available reproducible experiment > 3. More 3rd party tests > 4. More patents revealed > > Interesting the reverse order is in order of probability: 4,3,2,1. > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]>wrote: > >> My dear friends, >> I have just published: >> >> >> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/07/defkalion-has-kept-its-promise.html >> >> Good news coming... >> Peter >> >> >> -- >> Dr. Peter Gluck >> Cluj, Romania >> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >> > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
