Here is how the Ni/H reaction process looks in simple terms
Dipoles are the power source. Heat drives the Dipoles. Dipoles drive the EMF solitons via whispering wave resonance and application through concentration of EMF. The Solitions produce the anaopole nano-metric magnetic fields The negative charge in the solitons drives the positively charged ions of the dipoles close together. The anapole vortex based magnetic fields disrupts the *quantum chromodynamics *quark adhesion (strong force flux tubes) and the quarks realign onto the new anapole magnetic field line filaments within the Higgs nuclear superconductor. The quark realignment causes release of binding energy. Bose Einstein condensation (BEC) thermalizes the nuclear binding energy across many members of the condensate whose numbers are some small fraction of the countless billions of ensemble members in the extent of the global condensate established throughout the reaction chamber. Nickel does not melt because of condensate thermalization. Other LENR devices work for a time and then stop because there is not BEC thermalization. This addition of reaction energy in the form of heat creates more Dipole energy and the process cycles. On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 5:31 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: > How are you defining melting Axil? The energy released by a single fusion > event in the 50 nanometer sized particles is just enough to cause all of > the bonds to break apart. Perhaps this is the source of the tiny > explosions that are seen at the hot spots. The instantaneously hot metal > particles would flow until the heat is dissipated. They would initially be > at the melting point of nickel which might show up visually as hot spots. > > Dave > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Axil Axil <[email protected]> > To: vortex-l <[email protected]> > Sent: Thu, Aug 1, 2013 2:35 pm > Subject: Re: [Vo]:NiH NAE Synopsis? > > Nickel never melts. Atomic clusters of many elements and compounds form > when a plasma cools. > > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 2:30 PM, James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Are you confusing hydrogen clusters with Roberson's nanomagnetic-scale >> nickel clusters that he calculates would be melted? >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> The NAE that are the most powerful are formed between the smallest >>> nanoparticles. I do not know why this is true. >>> >>> >>> Small Rydberg hydrogen clusters are formed by sparks or heaters. They >>> are very small. When they land on the nickel particles on the nanowires >>> they produce powerful NAEs in the nano-spaces between the hydrogen clusters >>> and the nickel micro particles. These hydrogen clusters can be destroyed >>> and then rebuilt again by the next spark over and over again. >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 1:39 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> James, >>>> >>>> I performed a quick calculation earlier which suggested that nano >>>> scaled particles of that size (10nm) would melt with the amount of energy >>>> released and converted into heat from just one fusion. I may have made a >>>> calculation error so I encourage others to check that result, but the >>>> implication is that it would be better for these particles to be near 1 um >>>> or larger to prevent this from occurring too easily. If the energy escapes >>>> being converted into heat by radiation within these particles, then it >>>> would be OK at the smaller size. >>>> >>>> The fact that the process is temperature dependent to a large extent >>>> should generate suggestions to us about particle sizes. I wonder how the >>>> local heating of these hot spots interact with the larger nickel mass to >>>> allow for an overall stable design. >>>> >>>> It is good that we on vortex like solving complex puzzles. One day >>>> the pieces will fit. >>>> >>>> Dave >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: James Bowery <[email protected]> >>>> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> >>>> Sent: Thu, Aug 1, 2013 12:29 pm >>>> Subject: Re: [Vo]:NiH NAE Synopsis? >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> To put things into perspective, the Curie point and not the Debye >>>>> temperature of nickel seems to be the most important parameter for gain in >>>>> Ni-H. >>>>> >>>> OK, so now we have: >>>> >>>> Nickel nanomagnetic scale (sub 10nm) particles heated at least to >>>> Ni's Debye temperature, if not its Curie point, and infused with hydrogen >>>> -- the mixture being triggered to a NAE by ionizing the hydrogen. >>>> >>>> Areas of clarification needed: >>>> >>>> - Should "hydrogen" read "protium (ie: Hydrogen-1)"? >>>> - Should there be some characteristic of the ionizing energy >>>> specified so that the "infused" "hydrogen" is properly ionized? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 11:20 AM, James Bowery <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 7:38 PM, James Bowery <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Erratum: Debay -> Debye >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 7:38 PM, James Bowery <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Nickel nanoparticles heated to Ni's Debay temperature and infused >>>>>>> with hydrogen -- the mixture being triggered to a NAE by ionizing the >>>>>>> hydrogen. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Areas of clarification needed:... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Is there a technical name that can be given to the geometry of >>>>>>> the "nanoparticles" that would, for example, tell us where in the >>>>>>> "nano" >>>>>>> range the size of these particles should sit? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Nanomagnetic scale" (sub 10nm) is a term that may qualify. >>>>> >>>>> See pages 14-16 of: >>>>> >>>>> http://ecatsite.files.wordpress.com/2011/12/energy-localization-no8-11_n3.pdf >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
