Am I to understand, then, that:
- You don't, necessarily, take issue with Roberson's calculation that the amount of energy would tend to disintegrate the nanomagnetic-scale particle of nickel. - You, necessarily, differ from Roberson in that, instead of "melting" the particle, it turns it into a plasma which then, due to the tendency to form a "superatom", will "condense" back into a nanomagnetic-scale particle of nickel. ? On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > See Superatom > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superatom > > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Nickel never melts. Atomic clusters of many elements and compounds form >> when a plasma cools. >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 2:30 PM, James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Are you confusing hydrogen clusters with Roberson's nanomagnetic-scale >>> nickel clusters that he calculates would be melted? >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> The NAE that are the most powerful are formed between the smallest >>>> nanoparticles. I do not know why this is true. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Small Rydberg hydrogen clusters are formed by sparks or heaters. They >>>> are very small. When they land on the nickel particles on the nanowires >>>> they produce powerful NAEs in the nano-spaces between the hydrogen clusters >>>> and the nickel micro particles. These hydrogen clusters can be destroyed >>>> and then rebuilt again by the next spark over and over again. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 1:39 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> James, >>>>> >>>>> I performed a quick calculation earlier which suggested that nano >>>>> scaled particles of that size (10nm) would melt with the amount of energy >>>>> released and converted into heat from just one fusion. I may have made a >>>>> calculation error so I encourage others to check that result, but the >>>>> implication is that it would be better for these particles to be near 1 um >>>>> or larger to prevent this from occurring too easily. If the energy >>>>> escapes >>>>> being converted into heat by radiation within these particles, then it >>>>> would be OK at the smaller size. >>>>> >>>>> The fact that the process is temperature dependent to a large extent >>>>> should generate suggestions to us about particle sizes. I wonder how the >>>>> local heating of these hot spots interact with the larger nickel mass to >>>>> allow for an overall stable design. >>>>> >>>>> It is good that we on vortex like solving complex puzzles. One day >>>>> the pieces will fit. >>>>> >>>>> Dave >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: James Bowery <[email protected]> >>>>> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> >>>>> Sent: Thu, Aug 1, 2013 12:29 pm >>>>> Subject: Re: [Vo]:NiH NAE Synopsis? >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> To put things into perspective, the Curie point and not the Debye >>>>>> temperature of nickel seems to be the most important parameter for gain >>>>>> in >>>>>> Ni-H. >>>>>> >>>>> OK, so now we have: >>>>> >>>>> Nickel nanomagnetic scale (sub 10nm) particles heated at least to >>>>> Ni's Debye temperature, if not its Curie point, and infused with hydrogen >>>>> -- the mixture being triggered to a NAE by ionizing the hydrogen. >>>>> >>>>> Areas of clarification needed: >>>>> >>>>> - Should "hydrogen" read "protium (ie: Hydrogen-1)"? >>>>> - Should there be some characteristic of the ionizing energy >>>>> specified so that the "infused" "hydrogen" is properly ionized? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 11:20 AM, James Bowery <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 7:38 PM, James Bowery <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Erratum: Debay -> Debye >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 7:38 PM, James Bowery >>>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Nickel nanoparticles heated to Ni's Debay temperature and infused >>>>>>>> with hydrogen -- the mixture being triggered to a NAE by ionizing the >>>>>>>> hydrogen. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Areas of clarification needed:... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - Is there a technical name that can be given to the geometry >>>>>>>> of the "nanoparticles" that would, for example, tell us where in >>>>>>>> the "nano" >>>>>>>> range the size of these particles should sit? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "Nanomagnetic scale" (sub 10nm) is a term that may qualify. >>>>>> >>>>>> See pages 14-16 of: >>>>>> >>>>>> http://ecatsite.files.wordpress.com/2011/12/energy-localization-no8-11_n3.pdf >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
