Are you confusing hydrogen clusters with Roberson's nanomagnetic-scale nickel clusters that he calculates would be melted?
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > The NAE that are the most powerful are formed between the smallest > nanoparticles. I do not know why this is true. > > > > > > Small Rydberg hydrogen clusters are formed by sparks or heaters. They are > very small. When they land on the nickel particles on the nanowires they > produce powerful NAEs in the nano-spaces between the hydrogen clusters and > the nickel micro particles. These hydrogen clusters can be destroyed and > then rebuilt again by the next spark over and over again. > > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 1:39 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> James, >> >> I performed a quick calculation earlier which suggested that nano >> scaled particles of that size (10nm) would melt with the amount of energy >> released and converted into heat from just one fusion. I may have made a >> calculation error so I encourage others to check that result, but the >> implication is that it would be better for these particles to be near 1 um >> or larger to prevent this from occurring too easily. If the energy escapes >> being converted into heat by radiation within these particles, then it >> would be OK at the smaller size. >> >> The fact that the process is temperature dependent to a large extent >> should generate suggestions to us about particle sizes. I wonder how the >> local heating of these hot spots interact with the larger nickel mass to >> allow for an overall stable design. >> >> It is good that we on vortex like solving complex puzzles. One day the >> pieces will fit. >> >> Dave >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: James Bowery <[email protected]> >> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> >> Sent: Thu, Aug 1, 2013 12:29 pm >> Subject: Re: [Vo]:NiH NAE Synopsis? >> >> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> To put things into perspective, the Curie point and not the Debye >>> temperature of nickel seems to be the most important parameter for gain in >>> Ni-H. >>> >> OK, so now we have: >> >> Nickel nanomagnetic scale (sub 10nm) particles heated at least to Ni's >> Debye temperature, if not its Curie point, and infused with hydrogen -- the >> mixture being triggered to a NAE by ionizing the hydrogen. >> >> Areas of clarification needed: >> >> - Should "hydrogen" read "protium (ie: Hydrogen-1)"? >> - Should there be some characteristic of the ionizing energy >> specified so that the "infused" "hydrogen" is properly ionized? >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 11:20 AM, James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 7:38 PM, James Bowery <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Erratum: Debay -> Debye >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 7:38 PM, James Bowery <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Nickel nanoparticles heated to Ni's Debay temperature and infused >>>>> with hydrogen -- the mixture being triggered to a NAE by ionizing the >>>>> hydrogen. >>>>> >>>>> Areas of clarification needed:... >>>>> >>>>> - Is there a technical name that can be given to the geometry of >>>>> the "nanoparticles" that would, for example, tell us where in the >>>>> "nano" >>>>> range the size of these particles should sit? >>>>> >>>>> "Nanomagnetic scale" (sub 10nm) is a term that may qualify. >>> >>> See pages 14-16 of: >>> >>> http://ecatsite.files.wordpress.com/2011/12/energy-localization-no8-11_n3.pdf >>> >>> >> >
