Nickel never melts. Atomic clusters of many elements and compounds form when a plasma cools.
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 2:30 PM, James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: > Are you confusing hydrogen clusters with Roberson's nanomagnetic-scale > nickel clusters that he calculates would be melted? > > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The NAE that are the most powerful are formed between the smallest >> nanoparticles. I do not know why this is true. >> >> >> >> >> >> Small Rydberg hydrogen clusters are formed by sparks or heaters. They are >> very small. When they land on the nickel particles on the nanowires they >> produce powerful NAEs in the nano-spaces between the hydrogen clusters and >> the nickel micro particles. These hydrogen clusters can be destroyed and >> then rebuilt again by the next spark over and over again. >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 1:39 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> James, >>> >>> I performed a quick calculation earlier which suggested that nano >>> scaled particles of that size (10nm) would melt with the amount of energy >>> released and converted into heat from just one fusion. I may have made a >>> calculation error so I encourage others to check that result, but the >>> implication is that it would be better for these particles to be near 1 um >>> or larger to prevent this from occurring too easily. If the energy escapes >>> being converted into heat by radiation within these particles, then it >>> would be OK at the smaller size. >>> >>> The fact that the process is temperature dependent to a large extent >>> should generate suggestions to us about particle sizes. I wonder how the >>> local heating of these hot spots interact with the larger nickel mass to >>> allow for an overall stable design. >>> >>> It is good that we on vortex like solving complex puzzles. One day >>> the pieces will fit. >>> >>> Dave >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: James Bowery <[email protected]> >>> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Thu, Aug 1, 2013 12:29 pm >>> Subject: Re: [Vo]:NiH NAE Synopsis? >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> To put things into perspective, the Curie point and not the Debye >>>> temperature of nickel seems to be the most important parameter for gain in >>>> Ni-H. >>>> >>> OK, so now we have: >>> >>> Nickel nanomagnetic scale (sub 10nm) particles heated at least to Ni's >>> Debye temperature, if not its Curie point, and infused with hydrogen -- the >>> mixture being triggered to a NAE by ionizing the hydrogen. >>> >>> Areas of clarification needed: >>> >>> - Should "hydrogen" read "protium (ie: Hydrogen-1)"? >>> - Should there be some characteristic of the ionizing energy >>> specified so that the "infused" "hydrogen" is properly ionized? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 11:20 AM, James Bowery <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 7:38 PM, James Bowery <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Erratum: Debay -> Debye >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 7:38 PM, James Bowery <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Nickel nanoparticles heated to Ni's Debay temperature and infused >>>>>> with hydrogen -- the mixture being triggered to a NAE by ionizing the >>>>>> hydrogen. >>>>>> >>>>>> Areas of clarification needed:... >>>>>> >>>>>> - Is there a technical name that can be given to the geometry of >>>>>> the "nanoparticles" that would, for example, tell us where in the >>>>>> "nano" >>>>>> range the size of these particles should sit? >>>>>> >>>>>> "Nanomagnetic scale" (sub 10nm) is a term that may qualify. >>>> >>>> See pages 14-16 of: >>>> >>>> http://ecatsite.files.wordpress.com/2011/12/energy-localization-no8-11_n3.pdf >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
