He didn't say he was fired. It could as easily have been a disagreement over editorial policy causing him to resign. There is a difference. Moreover, his statement does indicate this, rather than him being "fired" was what happened.
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> wrote: > Mark Gibbs demonstrated what happens to mainstream reporters who talk > about cold fusion. I realize that he denies he was fired for talking > about cold fusion, but I think he is being diplomatic. His last > article said he planned to talk more about it, so he did not see this > coming. > > ***That's the first I've heard of Mark Gibbs getting fired. Any > further details? > > On 8/6/13, blaze spinnaker <[email protected]> wrote: > > OK jed! > > > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 7:56 AM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> blaze spinnaker <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > >>> "As things stand I think there is no chance that any article will be > >>> published in a respectable journal or mass media newspaper or website." > >>> > >>> Well, unless things have changed in the last few years to make cold > >>> fusion even more disreputable, this simply isn't true. I'll let Kevin > >>> fill > >>> you in on the details.. > >>> > >> > >> There have not been any mention of cold fusion in the mass media in the > >> last few years as far as I know, except for NyTeknik and and Forbes. > >> Forbes > >> is now closed. > >> > >> There have been a few journal papers published, but nothing about Rossi > >> or > >> Defkalion. Neither of them expresses any interest in publishing papers > >> themselves. > >> > >> - Jed > >> > >> > > > >
