Once science understands and gains total control of the nucleus of the atom, it will be possible to produce a 3D printer that can replicate products from a detailed specification stored in a data file.
Carbon from the atmosphere might well supply the feedstock for the atomic mass as required input for product replication. The customized output product will be supplied locally directly to the customer from a home based replicator unit. On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > This thread suffers from concept dissidence. The character of the elements > consumed or transmuted by a LENR reactor is based on the details of the > design of the LENR reaction. For example, the Defkalion reactor does not > consume nickel, it actually produces it. This reactor type consumes > hydrogen and other catalytic elements to produce light elements such as > boron and beryllium. > > > > > > A person who bets on what the LENR reaction will do, is well served by a > detailed study of the particular characteristics of the various LENR > reactions that might be commercialized. > > > > > > Furthermore, from the experimental results of LeClair, any elements can be > transmuted from water using the LENR reaction. > > > > > > The speculator might befit from a shorting strategy that targets every > industry that is currently established. These industries will all become > obsolete in the due course of time and replaced with a new paradigm of > industrialization. > > > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 11:04 AM, David Roberson <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I think you might be correct in the long run about tar sands. The main >> problem is figuring out what option terms are appropriate or even >> available. For some reason, change takes much longer than we suspect so >> timing will be important and many of us will become bored waiting. How >> long did it take for the transistor to displace tubes after its invention? >> There is a long list of delayed and lost investment potentials. >> >> Dave >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: blaze spinnaker <[email protected]> >> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> >> Sent: Thu, Aug 8, 2013 10:33 am >> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re-adjusting odds on Rossi/Defkalion being real lower, >> now ~27% >> >> I suspect the biggest impact will be on such uneconomical (and highly >> polluting) energy sources such as the Oil Sands in Canada. Buying long >> term put options on those seems like a smart play (with appropriate >> inflation hedges). >> >> On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 7:10 AM, David Roberson <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Rossi claims that the total usage of nickel by LENR devices will be >>> small compared to the current demand. Couple this extra small demand with >>> a long delay before large production and you observe what is happening in >>> the market. LENR should have a minor effect unless psychology boosts >>> expectations. >>> >>> Dave >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: blaze spinnaker <[email protected]> >>> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Thu, Aug 8, 2013 8:18 am >>> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re-adjusting odds on Rossi/Defkalion being real lower, >>> now ~27% >>> >>> "What part of the analysis am I getting wrong?" >>> >>> The problem with futures is storage fees tend to overwhelm price >>> movements. Plus the nickel promised by those futures might not even be the >>> type of nickel you can use for LENR. >>> >>> If you were going to use the market, I'd look more at nickel miners >>> who be well situated to pull out and refine the type of nickel needed for >>> these devices. >>> >>> Of course, another possibility may be that LENR isn't real so the >>> market is ignoring it. >>> >>> >>> >> >
