I hope that future generations are smart enough not to muck up the world with 
their endless playing around.  The complexity of our environment far surpasses 
our ability to safely modify it.


Dave



-----Original Message-----
From: ChemE Stewart <[email protected]>
To: vortex-l <[email protected]>
Sent: Thu, Aug 8, 2013 12:07 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re-adjusting odds on Rossi/Defkalion being real lower, now 
~27%


I think our atmosphere will be artificial also.  Too many germs in our current 
one

On Thursday, August 8, 2013, Axil Axil  wrote:


Once science understands and gainstotal control of the nucleus of the atom, it 
will be possible to produce a 3Dprinter that can replicate products from a 
detailed specification stored in adata file. 
 
Carbon from the atmosphere might wellsupply the feedstock for the atomic mass 
as required input for productreplication. The customized output product will be 
supplied locally directly tothe customer from a home based replicator unit.
 




On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:


This thread suffers from concept dissidence. The characterof the elements 
consumed or transmuted by a LENR reactor is based on thedetails of the design 
of the LENR reaction. For example, the Defkalion reactordoes not consume 
nickel, it actually produces it. This reactor type consumeshydrogen and other 
catalytic elements to produce light elements such as boronand beryllium. 
 
 
A person who bets on what the LENR reaction will do, is wellserved by a 
detailed study of the particular characteristics of the various LENRreactions 
that might be commercialized.
 
 
Furthermore, from the experimental results of LeClair, anyelements can be 
transmuted from water using the LENR reaction. 
 
 
The speculator might befit from ashorting strategy that targets every industry 
that is currently established.These industries will all become obsolete in the 
due course of time and replacedwith a new paradigm of industrialization.





On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 11:04 AM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote:

I think you might be correct in the long run about tar sands.  The main problem 
is figuring out what option terms are appropriate or even available.  For some 
reason, change takes much longer than we suspect so timing will be important 
and many of us will become bored waiting.  How long did it take for the 
transistor to displace tubes after its invention?  There is a long list of 
delayed and lost investment potentials.  


Dave



-----Original Message-----
From: blaze spinnaker <[email protected]>
To: vortex-l <[email protected]>

Sent: Thu, Aug 8, 2013 10:33 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re-adjusting odds on Rossi/Defkalion being real lower, now 
~27%


I suspect the biggest impact will be on such uneconomical (and highly 
polluting) energy sources such as the Oil Sands in Canada.   Buying long term 
put options on those seems like a smart play (with appropriate inflation 
hedges).


On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 7:10 AM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote:










Reply via email to