Do not confuse the situation with its description. It is not the description of the situation that is stupid; it is the underling situation that the description attempts to portray.
If you disagree with this description, then you are part of the situation. On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Sunil Shah <[email protected]> wrote: > This is one of the worst (stupidest) answers I've read in a long time. > /Sunil > > ------------------------------ > Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 23:10:30 -0400 > Subject: Re: [Vo]:What the heck is LENR+, anyway? > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > > > Wow, Jed Rothwell has awakened from a quarter century of slumber. The > Sleeper Has Finally Awakened. While you were asleep, Rossi has told us what > he was doing all along, all we had to do is listen…yes with concentration > and purpose but he has revealed all to those who would listen with > attention and to take heed. Piece by piece, clue by clue it was all > revealed in little bits and pieces. > > LENR does not use micro and nanoparticles and LENR+ does. That is what > Rossi first taught us, he told us to use small particles but not too small > and he even gave us the right size. He told us to cover the micro particles > with nanowire. There is also high pressure hydrogen involved. > He told us to use a catalyst that was activated through heating in the hot > hydrogen. And most importantly, he gave us faith that the thing he built > would work. I told you before that you never had this faith and you never > will have it. Without that faith, you will never invest in the work to look > for the answers. You are chained to the past by the ghosts of pons and > fleischmann, and by the production of helium in a cold fusion. > > I tried my best to teach you the rules behind it all but you just don’t > get it. I feel sorry for you and the others …for what you are missing… your > shoes nailed to the floor by LENR… because LENR+ is a thing of complex > beauty that you will never know. > >
