"I became a LENR believer on June 6th after reading Mark Gibb's 5/20/13 article about E-Cat 3rd Party Testing. "
Not a very rational way to start a discussion. "Belief" has its place, but only in a limited way. What's needed is a way to close the credibility gap between LENR and LENR+. That should be the entire focus of the movement. Until that reality is fully appreciated, there is nothing here but the plot to an X-Files episode. On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Mason Ainsworth <[email protected]>wrote: > Good Day to All. > > I became a LENR believer on June 6th after reading Mark Gibb's 5/20/13 > article about E-Cat 3rd Party Testing. I then googled "LENR" for more > reading. The core of my understanding is encompassed by LENRProof.com; I > have followed 90-95% of LENRPRoof's links. As a result, I set out on a > personal project and contacted Mark Gibbs. This mailing list was > recommended by Mark Gibbs in response to a brief description of my focus. > > I have followed the discussions here to get a sense of the nature of > Vortex-L and the participants. It seems that there is a strong coterie of > scientists and engineers driving the culture here. After learning of LENR, > I set out on a path which relates more to business. I ask for some patience > as I am not a scientist and tend towards a pragmatic view. And, as I live > in the US, my knowledge and perspective tends towards the provincial. > > To say that I'm a believer of LENR is an understatement. I'm working to > develop an understanding of the practical issues of LENR implementation. > Specifically, I am interested in fleshing out the perspective of the LENR > business executive and comprehending a rational strategy for introducing > LENR into the global market. I will be using accepted analytic models from > strategic business analysis and including links to Wiki articles when known > and available. > > I have just a few assumptions about LENR and four questions framing the > analysis. They are: > ASSUMPTIONS > 1. LENR is a real physical phenomena showing revolutionary global scale > benefits to humanity and the ecosystem > 2. LENR is capable of being a globally relevant energy source and able to > be the substitute for 90-99% of the world's energy needs > 3. LENR technology/engineering is reaching a stage of near term practical > implementation on an industry and global scale > > QUESTIONS > 1. Which Players are impacted and How are they impacted? > 2. What are the reasonable possible responses to LENR for each Player (or > category of Players) and What is the associated probability of implementing > the response? > 3. What are some important additional considerations to research before > synthesizing a LENR business strategy? > 4. For the LENR Executive, what is the reasonable rational best strategic > approach to introducing our firm's LENR product, given the above > information? > > > As I'm new to the board, it is a bit presumptuous for me to ask the > following:. > 1. I am asking for patience as I'm looking to frame an analytic structure > which suggests a prioritization of choices rather than prescriptions with a > '100% Guarantee'. I don't 'care' who will be the first, second, or third to > market. And, I likely do not know as much about LENR and the energy market > as all of you, collectively. > 2. I am asking for pointers to specific information which you judge can > push the balance between forces in a particular direction, e.g. Obama's > 2012 Executive order regarding CHPs > 3. I am asking for critiques on the short-comings of the analytic framework > 4. I am asking for critiques on the short-comings of the apparent > conclusions I draw as this whole effort progresses > > > I will follow up this email in a few days with a fleshing out of the > Questions with the supporting analytic tools. > > Thank you beforehand for your time. > > Mason >
