Dear Blaze, as i have told at my Blog comments too, I took this interview with Luca on July 24 and he instantly has answered that the demo was good."Le demo non potevano andare meglio!" If he has later changed his opinion and why I don't know, it is his business.
As regarding which virtues, skills, experience, credentials are necessary for solving the Cold Fusion problem- I have written a lot about it. Perhaps the most important is the problem-solver mentality and the second is understanding complexity- including dynamism and non-linearity. And good surprise management.Things are not always what they seem. Cold Fusion is a matter too complex to be let to the physicists" -it seems this nasty saying is true. Peter On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Blaze Spinnaker <[email protected]>wrote: > Mats and Peter should interview Luca Gamberale, the CTO of Defkalion > Europe where the test was done. John is a nice guy, I'm sure, but he's > never run a lab / published anything / etc before working at Defkalion. > He doesn't even have an advanced degree (he was a middle manager at some > health clinics or something and business process consultant, according to > his linked in resume). > > Luca however, has a PhD with quantum physics from a respectable university > and worked in the lab of both a university and a public company for 10+ > years and has significant amount of peer reviewed published papers to his > name. > > Who has more to lose if this goes awry? Who's more likely to provide > precise, scientifically accurate detail? Why did Luca bow out of the demo > at the last second? What does Luca think of all this? > > That's what I want to know.. > > > On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 6:36 AM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]>wrote: > >> They should have sparged the steam to demonstrate the flow rate and total >> enthalpy. Better yet, increase the flow to keep the water from boiling away. >> >> I do not buy the statement by Hadgichristos about the flow rate varying >> and the reactor temperature not rising. Where he says, "When coolant is >> in dry steam condition, flow is not constant. A pressure barrier within the >> coil surrounding the reactor creates flow flactuations . . ." Ed also >> pointed out this problem. This is not an adequate response. >> >> They should do this whole demo over again. They should rehearse >> beforehand with a script. They should make sure the third party engineering >> experts show up this time. When they finish, they should publish the >> results on line. >> >> It isn't as if there is a rule you can only do a demonstration once. >> >> - Jed >> >> > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
