In the Ni/H reactor, the job of nickel is to produce dipole motion. All the activity of the LENR reaction takes place in the nanoparticles that can be made of hydrogen, potassium, carbon, tungsten, zirconium…take a look at the material list that DGT lists as input to their reaction…and the ash assay that comes out of the reaction. There must be 50 different elements involved.
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > Many transition metals will work, some better than others. It’s not so > much the material but the topology that counts. And hydrogen seems to be a > key to beginning it all together. > > > On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Peter Gluck <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Actually I have said it very often however that it is >>> disaster not an error, it is more historical misfortune than >>> error of judgment.Let's e realist, we live in memecracies >>> and the meme of palladium-the cradle, the origin, the magic is still >>> too powerful. Technological progress will solve this problem- not with/for >>> palladium. >>> >> >> If you could tell us how to make Ni work, your position would be a lot >> stronger. As I said, most people who have tried Ni saw no heat or any other >> evidence of cold fusion. There are no known control parameters with Ni. >> Whereas Storms, Cravens and others have described how to make Pd work, and >> McKubre has described the control parameters. >> >> Since most people do not know how to make Ni, work, and you probably do >> not know either, I do not see why you criticize those who use Pd instead. >> Would it be better for them to spend years working with Ni getting no >> results at all? >> >> You might make the case that Rossi should file for a patent and tell >> people how to make Ni work, to speed up the pace of progress. Maybe he >> should. But he has chosen not to. So that option is out. >> >> As a practical matter, what do you suggest? >> >> - Jed >> >> >
