I think I have to answer to this open minded statement: *"If you could tell us how to make Ni work, your position would be a lot stronger. As I said, most people who have tried Ni saw no heat or any other evidence of cold fusion. There are no known control parameters with Ni. Whereas Storms, Cravens and others have described how to make Pd work, and McKubre has described the control parameters"' by Jed* * * and this, in part realistic one one by James (call me Peter): *I think its pretty safe to say Dr. Gluck is not focused on the science now that he has proximity to one of the Ni companies that, although they aren't submitting any disclosures to the patent offices, do appear to have reproducibility as a trade secret.** *
In a personal document "Ordeal" which I will not publish on my blog but I am sending to anybody who promises to not cite from it- I have described the process of discovery of how to make Ni to *work well. *To work as Pd does it is just interesting but not useful. The damned R problem could not been solved and this was, is nad will inacceptable. I have learned a lot from Piantelli who is great scientist, then I have concluded that Rossi has made an essential discovery, enhanced excess heat but was unable to control it and eventually I had the privilege to learn from Defkalion the very primciples that made them able to solve the problem of a good, well working Ni-H system. In my opinion they have published not too few but too many data about their technology, their basic principles.. However, till somebody is not accepting that enhanced excess heat is an other issues thn classic cold fusion/LENR,(LENR+ versus LENR) till it tries to mix PdD and NiH, till he/she thinks a single theory is able to explain a lot of sequences that lead to usable heat kW range, the dictature of the weakling Palladium king will continue. By the way, soon it will be published the Kim Hadjichristos ICCF-18 paper and great chances are that applying the endemic 3D method (Detailitis, Dilutitis, Disputitis) the focus here will be on why intense magnetic fields are not possible or why theory is not the best and the results will be not understood. Peter On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > Peter Gluck <[email protected]> wrote: > > Actually I have said it very often however that it is >> disaster not an error, it is more historical misfortune than >> error of judgment.Let's e realist, we live in memecracies >> and the meme of palladium-the cradle, the origin, the magic is still too >> powerful. Technological progress will solve this problem- not with/for >> palladium. >> > > If you could tell us how to make Ni work, your position would be a lot > stronger. As I said, most people who have tried Ni saw no heat or any other > evidence of cold fusion. There are no known control parameters with Ni. > Whereas Storms, Cravens and others have described how to make Pd work, and > McKubre has described the control parameters. > > Since most people do not know how to make Ni, work, and you probably do > not know either, I do not see why you criticize those who use Pd instead. > Would it be better for them to spend years working with Ni getting no > results at all? > > You might make the case that Rossi should file for a patent and tell > people how to make Ni work, to speed up the pace of progress. Maybe he > should. But he has chosen not to. So that option is out. > > As a practical matter, what do you suggest? > > - Jed > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
