Why not two dimensions? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holographic_principle
The universe is just a gigantic turing machine: https://who.rocq.inria.fr/Gilles.Dowek/Publi/universality2d.pdf On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Edmund Storms <[email protected]>wrote: > Yes, if 4 don't work, try 5. If 5 fail, try 50. As they say, with enough > variables, all data can be fit. It never occurs to these people that their > basic model may be wrong. They just keep adding variables and complexity > until all the points fall on a line. > > Ed Storms > > > On Dec 22, 2013, at 12:36 PM, Axil Axil wrote: > > There is a movement in quantum physics that I am partial to, that movement > involves the 5th dimension. > > Some big names in physics think that the 5th dimension holds the path to > new and better explanations involving the subatomic world. > > http://www.nbcnews.com/id/13070896/#.UrcvUbmA2AI > > “SEATTLE - The cosmos would make perfect sense … if it turns out we're > living in a 10- or 11-dimensional realm where gravity is bubbling off a > different plane entirely. At least that's what's emerging as the hottest > concept on the frontier of physics.” > > The 5th dimension makes sense to me as a hidden dimension that provides > communication between subatomic particles and supports the infrastructure > of gravity. > > > > http://phys.org/news/2013-12-creation-entanglement-simultaneously-wormhole.html > > Creation of entanglement simultaneously gives rise to a wormhole > > The quarks are connected by a wormhole that exists in the 5th dimension > where space and time does not exist. > > The 5th diminution is where wormholes exist, and where space and time does > not. > > Those who are interested in LENR might want to look beyond the billiard > ball model of the universe into waves and strings of light and their tips > (topological defects). > > > We can see this multi-dimensional principle in operation in a two > dimensional allegorical world on the surface of a swimming pool where the > counter rotating solitons are connected in a higher third dimension within > the depths of water in the pool. > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=909o_kbCdFg > > > Quarks are localized and confined vortexes (aka solitons) of energy that > exist in the Higgs field that do not dissipate because of the agency of the > superfuildic superconductivity of the Higgs field. > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ederft9dkag > > > Baths and Quarks: Solitons explained > > > Entanglement exists and is mediated in the 5th dimension and entanglement > stores energy when the quarks are formed or when the quarks are moved > apart. The 5th dimension is where the connective strong force operates. > > When a subatomic particle forms, its isospin is rooted deep in the 5th > dimension with just its vortex tip projecting into our 4 dimensional world. > > Electrons are just the tips of broken light strings whose spin is imbedded > into the 5th dimension. A cooper pair of protons or electrons is connected > by an energy channel that projects into the 5th dimension. > > > Most of the energy that makes up matter is stored in the 5th dimension. > Since all quarks are entangled, this entangled 5th dimension is where dark > energy lives and gravity operates. > > > Since the strong magnetic fields produced by LENR can destroy the > superconductivity that the quarks exist in, the connective energy between > the quarks is retrieved from the 5th dimension and made real again to > reappear and reenter back into our world. > > LENR is a way to manipulate the quantum world of the 5th dimension. > > > > > > On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Tampe: I couldn't agree more, it's very frustrating to learn QM. You >>> tend to >>> get a lot of powerful mathematical constructs but really no good mental >>> model how it all works. >>> >>> >>> Oh my. This is nonsensical to the max. No one is asking you to learn the >>> deepest secrets of QM. An adequate mental model is available with zero >>> math >>> - but - it is not the same logic as one finds in "common sense". How can >>> one >>> NOT have a mental model for quantum tunneling after all these years? In >>> fact >>> QM is more a process of ridding oneself of the wrong mental model than >>> learning a new one. One can mentally accept time reversal, for instance, >>> without leaning the intricacies of CPT symmetry and Kramer's theorem. "No >>> good mental model" and "ignoring what is real" are both complete >>> cop-outs. >>> >> >> I agree that Quantum tunneling is what may be behind this, and a few Å is >> enough >> for it to start do it's work, But the validity of calculation of the >> expansion with a >> virtual particle that temporally breaks the momentum conservation for >> quite some >> distance, makes me vary and want to wait for the paper to be moderated by >> experts in the >> field. I could be wrong here but that's my current intuition, that you >> need much smaller >> distances for the expansion to be valid. Anyhow if one can show that the >> tunneling is so >> strong at these distances the paper will be a very nice piece of >> evidence. Also the QM >> mechanism behind this expansion, can perhaps lead to further development >> so I would not >> throw the paper away. >> >> >> >>> I think Kalman has hit the nail on the heat with a version of neutron >>> exchange which is applicable to LENR, but to be honest my mental model of >>> the tunneling dynamics may not yet be what he is proposing. I hope that >>> my >>> understanding will be refined soon - since an attempt to contact Kalman >>> has >>> been made. My LENR-transposed model suggests that the two isotopes >>> (Ni61and >>> Ni58, and the other combinations) which are in the active nickel alloy, >>> are >>> adjoining at a few angstrom distance when an electron of modest energy >>> (or >>> more likely in LENR - a polariton) screens the two isotopes in such a way >>> that a neutron tunnels from the Ni61 to the N58, leaving Ni60 and Ni59 - >>> but >>> otherwise the electron does not react. What we have in the end is the >>> common >>> isotope of Ni60 and also Ni59, but since the Ni59 goes to cobalt by EC >>> with >>> no gamma, that fact makes this proposal FALSIFIABLE. The half-life is >>> long >>> but in fact small amounts of cobalt have been reported in LENR. >>> >> May be so >> >> >>> Tampe says he cannot get his mind around the Kalman model of quantum >>> tunneling, due to the mathematics - even though he is sitting in front >>> of a >>> computer which is doing billions of QM tunneling reactions per second to >>> put >>> his words into cyberspace - and that CPU can do the mathematics for him. >>> One >>> type of tunneling in nuclear and the other is electromagnetic but they >>> are >>> part of the same QM phenomena - where a particle tunnels through a >>> barrier >>> that it "classically" could not surmount. In fact, the nuclear version >>> came >>> before the semiconductor version and yet the later verifies the former. >>> >> >> It's not the tunneling that I do not understand, I have not followed all >> calculations >> and I'm really not an expert here with about a semester of QM 15 yeras >> ago, but I do not >> want say that it works and perhaps I need to stress it, it may work I >> don't know really. >> >> >> >>> Kalman may have provided one huge clue for an M.O. that opens up >>> everything. >>> It is too early to say but it is waaaaay too early to dismiss this paper >>> as >>> being too strange or too mathematical. >>> >>> >> I do not dispute that this might be the final verdict of the paper, if I >> come through as a harch >> critic, I'm sorry for that, Just that it is wise to await peer review. >> >> Cheers! >> >> > >
