Yes, if 4 don't work, try 5. If 5 fail, try 50. As they say, with
enough variables, all data can be fit. It never occurs to these
people that their basic model may be wrong. They just keep adding
variables and complexity until all the points fall on a line.
Ed Storms
On Dec 22, 2013, at 12:36 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
There is a movement in quantum physics that I am partial to, that
movement involves the 5th dimension.
Some big names in physics think that the 5th dimension holds the
path to new and better explanations involving the subatomic world.
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/13070896/#.UrcvUbmA2AI
“SEATTLE - The cosmos would make perfect sense … if it turns out
we're living in a 10- or 11-dimensional realm where gravity is
bubbling off a different plane entirely. At least that's what's
emerging as the hottest concept on the frontier of physics.”
The 5th dimension makes sense to me as a hidden dimension that
provides communication between subatomic particles and supports the
infrastructure of gravity.
http://phys.org/news/2013-12-creation-entanglement-simultaneously-wormhole.html
Creation of entanglement simultaneously gives rise to a wormhole
The quarks are connected by a wormhole that exists in the 5th
dimension where space and time does not exist.
The 5th diminution is where wormholes exist, and where space and
time does not.
Those who are interested in LENR might want to look beyond the
billiard ball model of the universe into waves and strings of light
and their tips (topological defects).
We can see this multi-dimensional principle in operation in a two
dimensional allegorical world on the surface of a swimming pool
where the counter rotating solitons are connected in a higher third
dimension within the depths of water in the pool.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=909o_kbCdFg
Quarks are localized and confined vortexes (aka solitons) of energy
that exist in the Higgs field that do not dissipate because of the
agency of the superfuildic superconductivity of the Higgs field.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ederft9dkag
Baths and Quarks: Solitons explained
Entanglement exists and is mediated in the 5th dimension and
entanglement stores energy when the quarks are formed or when the
quarks are moved apart. The 5th dimension is where the connective
strong force operates.
When a subatomic particle forms, its isospin is rooted deep in the
5th dimension with just its vortex tip projecting into our 4
dimensional world.
Electrons are just the tips of broken light strings whose spin is
imbedded into the 5th dimension. A cooper pair of protons or
electrons is connected by an energy channel that projects into the
5th dimension.
Most of the energy that makes up matter is stored in the 5th
dimension. Since all quarks are entangled, this entangled 5th
dimension is where dark energy lives and gravity operates.
Since the strong magnetic fields produced by LENR can destroy the
superconductivity that the quarks exist in, the connective energy
between the quarks is retrieved from the 5th dimension and made real
again to reappear and reenter back into our world.
LENR is a way to manipulate the quantum world of the 5th dimension.
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe <[email protected]
> wrote:
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]>
wrote:
Tampe: I couldn't agree more, it's very frustrating to learn QM. You
tend to
get a lot of powerful mathematical constructs but really no good
mental
model how it all works.
Oh my. This is nonsensical to the max. No one is asking you to learn
the
deepest secrets of QM. An adequate mental model is available with
zero math
- but - it is not the same logic as one finds in "common sense". How
can one
NOT have a mental model for quantum tunneling after all these years?
In fact
QM is more a process of ridding oneself of the wrong mental model than
learning a new one. One can mentally accept time reversal, for
instance,
without leaning the intricacies of CPT symmetry and Kramer's
theorem. "No
good mental model" and "ignoring what is real" are both complete cop-
outs.
I agree that Quantum tunneling is what may be behind this, and a few
Å is enough
for it to start do it's work, But the validity of calculation of the
expansion with a
virtual particle that temporally breaks the momentum conservation
for quite some
distance, makes me vary and want to wait for the paper to be
moderated by experts in the
field. I could be wrong here but that's my current intuition, that
you need much smaller
distances for the expansion to be valid. Anyhow if one can show that
the tunneling is so
strong at these distances the paper will be a very nice piece of
evidence. Also the QM
mechanism behind this expansion, can perhaps lead to further
development so I would not
throw the paper away.
I think Kalman has hit the nail on the heat with a version of neutron
exchange which is applicable to LENR, but to be honest my mental
model of
the tunneling dynamics may not yet be what he is proposing. I hope
that my
understanding will be refined soon - since an attempt to contact
Kalman has
been made. My LENR-transposed model suggests that the two isotopes
(Ni61and
Ni58, and the other combinations) which are in the active nickel
alloy, are
adjoining at a few angstrom distance when an electron of modest
energy (or
more likely in LENR - a polariton) screens the two isotopes in such
a way
that a neutron tunnels from the Ni61 to the N58, leaving Ni60 and
Ni59 - but
otherwise the electron does not react. What we have in the end is
the common
isotope of Ni60 and also Ni59, but since the Ni59 goes to cobalt by
EC with
no gamma, that fact makes this proposal FALSIFIABLE. The half-life
is long
but in fact small amounts of cobalt have been reported in LENR.
May be so
Tampe says he cannot get his mind around the Kalman model of quantum
tunneling, due to the mathematics - even though he is sitting in
front of a
computer which is doing billions of QM tunneling reactions per
second to put
his words into cyberspace - and that CPU can do the mathematics for
him. One
type of tunneling in nuclear and the other is electromagnetic but
they are
part of the same QM phenomena - where a particle tunnels through a
barrier
that it "classically" could not surmount. In fact, the nuclear
version came
before the semiconductor version and yet the later verifies the
former.
It's not the tunneling that I do not understand, I have not followed
all calculations
and I'm really not an expert here with about a semester of QM 15
yeras ago, but I do not
want say that it works and perhaps I need to stress it, it may work
I don't know really.
Kalman may have provided one huge clue for an M.O. that opens up
everything.
It is too early to say but it is waaaaay too early to dismiss this
paper as
being too strange or too mathematical.
I do not dispute that this might be the final verdict of the paper,
if I come through as a harch
critic, I'm sorry for that, Just that it is wise to await peer review.
Cheers!
