Observation of your model reminds me of how electrons might be distributed as a result of the presence of a strong high frequency resonance. If the particle is tuned carefully then a sharp peak in response would seem likely. If the drive frequency is not carefully tuned, the peak would be reduced a large amount provided the particle acts as a high Q resonate tank.
I have difficulty accepting the condition that most of the particles have the same resonant frequency since that parameter should be a strong function of the 3 dimensional shape of each nano particle as well as coupling to the nearby ones. Perhaps the scrambling of the powder by external and internal fields or vibrations results in regions that have a sharp resonant response where your model operates. Also, there may be some unknown force that arises out of the mix that coordinates the activity. Non linear systems occasionally tend to generate peaks that far exceed any expected by linear vector additions and rouge ocean waves appear to exhibit this type of behavior. The reported extreme magnetic fields of the DGT device could be the agent that scrambles and then coordinates the resonance you describe. I suspect that the particles would be pushed and pulled by such a field. My favorite type of coordinating mechanism is one that exhibits positive feedback. In that case, the effect you seek causes a change to a variable that reinforces the original agent of change. In this manner the field and effect build together to a value that far exceeds any that would be observed by the interaction of the relatively minor early stages. If the system only depended upon the initial levels, the effect would be buried within the noise. My model of Rossi's ECAT works in a manner somewhat consistent with that description. If the ECAT did not exhibit positive feedback by thermal means, the controlled power output would be much less. He appears to be fortunate in finding a control means that allows his device to operate with a COP greater than 6. If we delve into the world of oscillators, some ideas might arise that reveal important clues. The large magnetic field seen by DGT likely is a result of a large flow of charged particles within the device. Assuming that there is no significant magnetic field before LENR takes over, I immediately would conclude that there is some form of feedback involving the local magnetic field level and the fusion reaction. Furthermore, the fusion reactions that arise as a result of the local field must somehow cause that field to increase in magnitude. Perhaps we should look for a mechanism that ejects electrons or other charged particles in sync with the current magnetic field at each location. If these suspect charged particles are randomly emitted, then they would not tend to reinforce the original control field. This search for a process appears to be an excellent project. Dave -----Original Message----- From: pagnucco <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Sat, Jan 18, 2014 3:34 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:The photo reactor David, Here is an very simplified view of how colliding oppositely charged plasmon waves might look when two adjacent metallic nanoparticles are subjected to a large voltage gradient. Surface electrons and protons (or +ions) quickly flow to opposite sides and the nanoparticles collide with assistance of the local coulomb field. The positive and negative charges at the collision point receive large additional energy kicks from like-charges behind them and opposite-charges in front. The additional collectively supplied energy/momentum can be very large - and analogous to how the atom at an arrow's tip borrows energy from the arrow body to penetrate a target it would bounce off of if it was a separate atom. | (+) (-) | | <-------------- VOLTAGE -----------------> | | | -+ -+ ---+++ ---+++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ ---- ++++ ---- ++++ ---- ++++ ---- ++++ ----- +++++----- +++++ ---- ++++ ---- ++++ ---- ++++ ---- ++++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ ---+++ ---+++ -+ -+ NANOPARTICLE NANOPARTICLE David Roberson wrote: > Axil, > > How does quantum mechanics explain this phenomenon? Is this new physics > of some type or just super heating of the region where the IR contacts the > particles? > > The IR must induce an extremely large electron current flow on the surface > of the metal which of course leads to a strong magnetic field. Is it this > field that lowers the threshold required to fuse? One of my favorite > concepts is that the electric field induced by the rapidly changing > magnetic field could accelerate protons so that they fuse. This would be > a form of hot fusion if active. > > What is your opinion as to the mechanism? > > Dave > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Axil Axil <[email protected]> > To: vortex-l <[email protected]> > Sent: Sat, Jan 18, 2014 2:09 pm > Subject: [Vo]:The photo reactor > > > Beside neutrons, there is another less traveled road to the initiation of > nuclear reactions that has been under the radar in the nuclear community. > > Many years ago, it was shown that high energy lasers could induce fission > and fusion if the power of the laser pulse was strong enough > > http://physics.aps.org/story/v5/st3 > > Photo induced nuclear reactions begin to occur when the power density of > the infrared light reached just under 10^^20 W/cm2. > > Since the time of unaided photo nuclear reactions were demonstrated at the > turn of this century, it has been shown that gold nano-particles used as > nano-lenses can amplify and concentrate infrared light by 9 orders of > magnitudes. This is experimentally verified performance that comes out of > the science of Nanoplasmonics. > > Now with gold Nano-particles, it is logical to expect nuclear reactions > will occur when laser light with an intensity of 10^^10 W/cm2 to 10^^12 > W/cm2 will occur. If you are interested, experimental results have been > published as verification. That is 9 orders of magnitude less than unaided > photo irradiation. Experiments using gold nano-particles in water > suspension irradiated by laser light of this reduced level of intensity do > in fact occur. > > Since then, experimentally verified light amplification by nano-structures > has been observed to reach a top end of 10 to the 15 power. > > The idea is that if more and more nano-particle infrared photo > concentration is applied to a system, then less and less infrared photon > input energy will produce a nuclear reaction. > > In current photo reactors under development, with additional tweaking of > more effective methods and materials, together with improved > nano-structure shapes and topology, it is not unreasonable to expect that > 10 to the 20th power concentration or more of photo application might be > reached. > > In current photo based nuclear reactors, that means that it is reasonable > to assume that nuclear reactions will occur if UNAPMLIFIED infrared light > were to interact with properly engineered nanostructures. > > Increased infrared photo amplification is what has been done in the design > of the current crop of Nickel/Hydrogen reactors. > > By the way, both the Mills reactor and the Santilli process are other > examples of photo reactors but these inventors just donât know it yet. > > The Open Physical Chemistry Journal, 2013, 5, 17-27 > > Confirmations of Santilliâs Intermediate Controlled Nuclear Fusion of > Deuterium and Carbon Into Nitrogen Without Harmful Radiations > > J. V. Kadeisvili, C. Lynch and Y. Yang > > Abstract: We present five independent confirmations of the intermediate > controlled nuclear fusion of Nitrogen from Deuterium and Carbon without > the emission of harmful radiations or the release of radioactive waste, > first achieved by R. M. Santilli [12] following extended mathematical, > theoretical and experimental research, and preliminarily confirmed by > R.Brenna, T. Kuliczkowski, and L.Ying [13]. > > http://www.benthamscience.com/open/topc ... 7TOPCJ.pdf > > This is just another spark driven nanoplasmonic LENR system. > > The photo driven anapole magnetic field produced by nanoparticles is > recognized by the inventor but it is called a Santilli magnecules. > > A pattern is forming involving spark driven nanoparticle based LENR > systems: Santilli, Mills, Rossi and DGT. > > The inventors of these systems all have a differing theoretical > explanation of their reaction, but they are all basically the same > nanoplasmonic driven photo reactors. > >
