Re from the patent:

The current may be AC, DC or an AC-DC mixture. In

an embodiment, comprising a magnetohydrodynamic plasma to electric power
converter, the

current is DC such that a DC magnetic field is produced by the current.


The MHD converter is not developed yet so the demo will require external
power.


By the way. the patent is written to confuse and it is successful. The
patent defines every voltage, amperage, pulse rate and arc duration, and
every chemical that exists. In short, it says everything and its says
nothing.


On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote:

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nigel Dyer
>
> The components of the demo don't look to me to be much like, for example
> the Catalyst Induced Hydrino Transition Electrochemical Cell, so I was
> trying to work out what what we know about this configuration.
>
> For example, the energizing electrodes that are mentioned. Do we have
> an idea of what voltages might be involved and exactly how the
> electrodes energize the water?   In some respects this setup seems oddly
> familiar.
>
>
>
> Nigel,
>
> Well - I do not profess to know what will be shown - but if this demo is
> not
> clearly self-powering (no battery or external PS) then it will be a
> disaster. It will not be sufficient to extrapolate. At this point in time,
> Mills must show a self-running device IMHO.
>
> Based on the history of LENR, as early as 1990 (if not 1989) it was
> suggested that the obvious thing to do with an electrolysis cell which is
> overunity, like the P&F cell - is to connect the gas output to a PEM fuel
> cell and thereby to "self-loop" the two. However, in the case of Pd-D the
> net gain is in thermal energy, and not in excess gas - so self-power cannot
> be accomplished easily that way.
>
> However, it is possible in the case of plasma electrolysis of water - for
> the excess energy to be in the form of excess hydrogen and oxygen, and this
> is my hope for the BLP demo - even if we are only in the 100 watt range of
> power which is being circulated. At one time it looked like Mizuno could
> pull this off with his glow discharge cell - but he never did.
>
> This demo will be a success if there is looped system (fully self-powering)
> in the 100 watt range, even if there is no usable excess. That is because
> no
> one has really done it before in a 3rd party demo. (there are numerous
> claims and reports of looping having been accomplished for short periods,
> but not in a robust, on-demand way or by a reputable inventor who is
> prepared to show it to independent third parties).
>
> Therefore - It is safe to say for the record that there is no independently
> proved self-powering energy device as of 2014 - and if Mills can pull that
> off - hats off to him. He will steal most of Rossi's thunder.
>
> Jones
>
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to