you have 3 significant digits for 1/137.12 (i.e. 137) while Mills has 9+ significant digits that match the rest mass of the electron (i.e. 510998.896) and he does it for 5 equations that are classical and he does it in a logical fashion that a college physics student would understand,
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 2:12 PM, James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: > From "Quaternion > Physics<http://books.google.com/books?id=f9IPh4IxteMC&pg=PA46&lpg=PA46&dq=quaternion+fine+structure+constant> > ": > > "In examining the Hydrogen atoms Quantum speed, 1/2(e/q)² = 1/137.12 appears > and is approximagely equal to α." > > Quaternions are the third normed division algebra. > > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 11:40 AM, James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Interesting. Do the normed division algebras enter into Mills' theory? >> >> If so, I have something to contribute: >> >> There may be a mathematical identity between the 4 normed division >> algebras and the 4 levels of the combinatorial hierarchy. >> >> A paper by Stanford researcher Pierre Noyes describing the prediction of >> cosmological measurements based on the combinatorial hierarchy (which is >> therein defined): >> >> http://slac.stanford.edu/cgi-wrap/getdoc/slac-pub-8779.pdf >> >> The reason I am suspicious that there is a connection between the two is >> the parsimony with which the third level of the combinatorial hierarchy's >> electroweak interaction can be described by quaternions, and my intuition >> that the strong interaction may parsimoniously be described by complex >> numbers. >> >> An introduction to Noyes's bitstring physics: >> >> http://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/9707020.pdf >> >> wherein he associates the four levels of the combinatorial hierarchy with >> the four scale constants for the superstrong, strong, electroweak and >> gravitational interactions respectively >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 10:00 PM, Jeff Driscoll <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I tried to summarize a few reasons why I believe Randell Mills's theory >>> of the atom. >>> >>> ============================================== >>> For decades, physicists have struggled with how to interpret the fine >>> structure constant, alpha = 1/137.035999 >>> Physicist Richard Feynman said this decades ago: "It has been a mystery >>> ever since it was discovered more than fifty years ago, and all good >>> theoretical physicists put this number up on their wall and worry about it." >>> Feynman also said: "It's one of the greatest damn mysteries of physics: >>> A magic number with no understanding by man" >>> >>> In my view, the value of the fine structure constant is explained by >>> Randell Mills's model of the hydrogen atom. >>> In Mills's model, the principal quantum number n can take on fractional >>> values with the smallest being n =1/137. For purposes of the following >>> energy calculations, assume an electron is orbiting around the proton in a >>> stable orbit at the principal quantum number n = 1/137.035999 (i.e. the >>> fine structure constant, alpha) and has a radius R based on Mills's >>> theory. An electron orbiting at this radius R has the following 5 energy >>> calculations related to it and they *all* equal exactly 510998.896 eV or >>> the rest mass of the electron (this is to 9+ significant digits!). >>> The energy equations are: >>> 1. Resonant energy of the vacuum for a sphere having radius R. >>> 2. Capacitive energy of a sphere having radius R. >>> 3. Magnetic energy for an electron orbiting a proton on the infinite >>> number of "great circles" (as described by Mills) on the surface of a >>> sphere having radius R. >>> 4. Planck equation energy for a photon having a wavelength that matches >>> a sphere having radius R. >>> 5. Electric potential energy for an electron evaluated at infinity >>> relative to a sphere having radius R with a proton at the center. >>> >>> The amazing thing is that these 5 energy equations above are classical, >>> meaning no quantum theory is involved and it uses Newtonian dynamics and >>> Maxwell's equations. The 5 energy equations are exactly the same as found >>> in physics textbooks. >>> The energy equations are related to Mills's "Pair Production" (where a >>> photon is converted into an electron) and to have an organized, logical >>> theory have such a coincidence where they all equal the rest mass of the >>> electron would be impossible in my view. >>> >>> Mills's equations for the radius of the orbiting electron can be derived >>> using the same methods as Niels Bohr but with slightly different >>> postulates. >>> >>> 1. Bohr postulated that the momentum of the electron was equal to the >>> principal quantum number multiplied by the reduced Planck constant for all >>> stable orbits. Mills postulates that the momentum of the electron is equal >>> to *only* the reduced Planck constant at all stable orbits (i.e. it is not >>> a function of principal quantum number). >>> 2. Bohr postulated that the electric charge experienced by the electron >>> due to the proton is equal to e (the elementary charge) for all stable >>> orbits. Mills postulates that the electric charge experienced by the >>> electron due to the proton *and* the trapped photon is equal to e/n or the >>> elementary charge divided by the principal quantum number for all stable >>> orbits. >>> >>> You can find out more about Randell Mills's theory at my website here: >>> >>> http://zhydrogen.com >>> >>> Side note: Mills's lowest allowed orbit is 1/137 not 1/137.035999 and (I >>> think) the difference between the two numbers is related to a small >>> magnetic interaction between the electron and the proton. You can see more >>> detail in Mills's book, Grand Unified Theory of Classical Physics (GUTCP) >>> which is streamed here: >>> >>> http://www.blacklightpower.com/theory-2/book/book-download/ >>> >>> >>> >> > -- Jeff Driscoll 617-290-1998
