If the ELFORSK report was so impressive, why did we not hear about a major commitment by ELFORSK for Rossi and his products? Words a cheap, dollars are impressive.
We know now the ELFORSK is not his backer. On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > I wrote: > > >> I saw the defkalion demo with my own eyes. . . . >>> >> > >> I thought the ELFORSK report was more convincing than any demo. A >> demonstration is a good way to teach people about your experiment, but it >> is less convincing than a paper which describes weeks of testing. >> > > What I am saying is that seeing something with your own eyes is overrated. > Ask yourself carefully: What did you see? What did you not see? How likely > is it that what you saw was a mistake? How does that likelihood compare to > the likelihood that the people from ELFORSK made mistakes over the weeks > they observed experiments? Why do you think that your observations from a > video are better than their observations in a report? > > To summarize in the words of the old joke: What are you going to believe, > two weeks of data, or your own lying eyes? > > - Jed > >
