I wrote:
> I saw the defkalion demo with my own eyes. . . . >> > > I thought the ELFORSK report was more convincing than any demo. A > demonstration is a good way to teach people about your experiment, but it > is less convincing than a paper which describes weeks of testing. > What I am saying is that seeing something with your own eyes is overrated. Ask yourself carefully: What did you see? What did you not see? How likely is it that what you saw was a mistake? How does that likelihood compare to the likelihood that the people from ELFORSK made mistakes over the weeks they observed experiments? Why do you think that your observations from a video are better than their observations in a report? To summarize in the words of the old joke: What are you going to believe, two weeks of data, or your own lying eyes? - Jed
