Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: I saw the defkalion demo with my own eyes. I did not need interpretation > from others for the information. This is important to me. >
It is true that Rossi never broadcast one of his demos. Mats Lewan uploaded videos of some of them, but they do not have beginning-to-end coverage. However, in my opinion, even though Rossi's demos are not broadcast, some of them are more believable than Defkalion's demonstration. Defkalion's demonstration was pretty good but some issues have arisen that call it into question. Hadjichristos himself pointed out some problems with the flow rate. They should do it again. Things like this need to be done several times. I got the impression the ICCF18 demo was a rush job, done without much planning or rehearsal. That's okay. It just means they should try again. I thought the ELFORSK report was more convincing than any demo. A demonstration is a good way to teach people about your experiment, but it is less convincing than a paper which describes weeks of testing. - Jed
