Thanks Blaze - Interesting to look at their patent portfolio in the context of LENR.
There are a range of patents which overlap areas in LENR - showing at least that there is expertise. https://www.google.com/search?tbo=p <https://www.google.com/search?tbo=p&tbm=pts&hl=en&q=inassignee:research+ina ssignee:triangle+inassignee:institute&num=10> &tbm=pts&hl=en&q=inassignee:research+inassignee:triangle+inassignee:institut e&num=10 Of course - everyone wants to know WHO exactly validated the device, and did they avoid the pitfalls which are common in poor evaluations. Some of us had a brief look, several years back - at the validation study which Ampenergo used to evaluate the ECat - and it was shoddy. Actually worse than shoddy. RTI is a giant step up from that, in terms of organizational competence - and there is no reason to suggest that due diligence was not used . and it is hoped that they obtained some of their insight from reading the comments here and elsewhere. From: Blaze Spinnaker http://www.rti.org/page.cfm/Corporate_Governance Tom is on the board of governors for RTI.
