Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote:
> Of course - everyone wants to know WHO exactly validated the device, and > did they avoid the pitfalls which are common in poor evaluations. > It says right there in the press release. They cite the ELFORSK report. Perhaps they have other reports. > Some of us had a brief look, several years back - at the validation study > which Ampenergo used to evaluate the ECat - and it was shoddy. Actually > worse than shoddy. > I thought it was pretty good. It was standard HVAC calorimetry with off-the-shelf industrial equipment. - Jed
