That is a good description. Now let's say there is a vacuum component in our atmosphere along with the Higgs field. If you gradually add energy to it 24/7 thru megawatts of pulsed microwave doppler EMF, would this field not discharge that energy to the Earth at some point, possibly increasing ionization and decay below, like my data is showing around these radars? Or are you military and don't want to comment?
On Friday, January 31, 2014, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > The vacuum is a spin net liquid in which subatomic particles of all > varieties fleetingly pop into being and then are destroyed in a very short > time. > > Think of these particles as a pair of counter rotating energy vortexes > with the vortex pair connected by a thin channel. > > The vacuum is filled by tiny bits of transient energy with randomly > oriented quantum's of spins. Just like when light moves from atom to atom > in matter, it is on these bits of coherent counter rotating bits of energy > and there spin that photons of EMF jump from bit to bit in rapid succession > as the EMF moves through the vacuum not always in a straight line. > > When a metal plate intercepts some of these spins, an attractive or > repulsive force is generated between the plates. > > It is seen that the plates do affect the virtual photons which constitute > the field, and generate a net force--either an attraction or a repulsion > depending on the specific arrangement of the two plates. Although the > Casimir effect can be expressed in terms of virtual particles interacting > with the objects, it is best described and more easily calculated in terms > of the zero-point energy of a quantized vacuum field in the intervening > space between the objects. > > A spin net liquid is the only medium that EMF can use as a transport > medium and it is consistent with the Maxwell equations. > > http://dao.mit.edu/~wen/NSart-wen.html > > In this theory of the universe where particles are energy vortexes, light > and electrons are the same and other types of matter spring from the nature > of the spin net liquid. > > One reason why radioactivity is affected by LENR is because the spin net > liquid of the vacuum is affected by the huge magnetic spins produced by > LENR hotspots. LENR reactions can increase the rate of radioactive decay > through modifying the virtual particle nature of the vacuum. > > The magnetic field of the sun can also effect the decay of radioactive > isotopes through vacuum modification and this is been seen experimentally > during intense sun spot activity. > > These coherent bits of energy also form the superconducting medium of the > Higgs field whose resistive nature gives mass to matter. > > > On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 2:24 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com>wrote: > > I have a question regarding the Casimir effect that someone might be able > to assist me in answering. There is discussion of how this effect is able > to squeeze the hydrogen atom into one of the fractional states and I wonder > why this same force does not push apart the atoms or whatever else may be > generating that force. Please offer an explanation as to why the hydrogen > is squeezed but the surrounding atoms are not pushed back in an equal and > opposite manner. > > Are we to believe that the Casimir force acts in only one direction and in > violation to Newton's laws? > > Dave > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Roarty, Francis X <francis.x.roa...@lmco.com> > To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > Sent: Fri, Jan 31, 2014 12:55 pm > Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Higgs and LENR > > Also if each Ni nucleus in the sea of Ni would have to experience the > role of the so called catalyst it would be as part of "casimir" group not > individually - and as the tapestry changes wrt a moving gas atom it will > experience changes in this field - dynamic casimir effect. I am not even > sure that transmutation would effect that field as long as the element > remains metal and does not significantly change the local geometry the > casimir force should remain unchanged.. IMHO it is a difference of scales > where the same HUP responsible for the random motion of the gas atoms at > the lower scale can be unbalanced and accumulated at a higher scale by the > Ni. [1/plate spacing ^3] to form regions with different values of casimir > force. > Fran > > *From:* Edmund Storms [mailto:stor...@ix.netcom.com] > *Sent:* Friday, January 31, 2014 12:06 PM > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Cc:* Edmund Storms > *Subject:* EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Higgs and LENR > > Fran, do you realize how strange this explanation sounds? The H has to > climb over a Coulomb barrier having a charge of 28. We know how hard > getting over a change of 1 is, so how is this barrier overcome so easily? > Second, each Ni nucleus in the sea of Ni would have to experience the role > of the so called catalyst. This magic catalyst would have to move from Ni > to Ni as each was converted to Cu because apparently the magic catalyst is > not able to add H to copper or apparently to any thing else. Each small > particle of Ni would have to contain the magic catalyst and a large > fraction of the Ni would have to be converted to Cu in order to account for > the energy being claimed. Common sense is violated! Can people please > consider the obvious and necessary consequences before applying pure > imagination? In addition, we have no evidence that Cu is produced. Rossi > even has withdrawn this claim. > > Ed Storms > On Jan 31, 2014, at 9:43 AM, Roarty, Francis X wrote: > > > > > Just saw this: > > http://ecatsuomi.wordpress.com/2014/01/30/arto-lauri-i-will-take-on-how-the-e-cat-works/ > < > >
