DGT: "After each triggering duty cycle (the triggering sequences producing excess heat), the magnetic fields at ~18 cm from the reactor at all three locations rose from ~0.6 Tesla to ~1.6 Tesla (DC peak) during each reaction period. Such anomalous peak signals were maintained for approximately 3-4 sec after the HV currents were cut off. "
Axil: The duty cycle is triggered by a high voltage current. After the HV spark, the magnetic field measures .6 tesla. The magnetic field grows along with the reaction for 3-4 seconds. At the peak of the reaction cycle, the magnetic field is 1.6 tesla. Read it yourself here: http://www.physics.purdue.edu/people/faculty/yekim/ICCF-18-JCMNS-KH-Pre-2.pdf On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 4:16 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > In reply to Axil Axil's message of Sun, 2 Mar 2014 13:23:09 -0500: > Hi, > [snip] > > I was under the impression that DGT started with a 1 Tesla field that they > created themselves, and that the experiment itself increased this to 1.6 > T. IOW > a 60% increase. It is common for ferromagnetic materials to increase the > field > strength of a magnet when inserted into the core of a coil, due to the > materials > electron spins aligning themselves with the field, so I would not be > surprised > to find that the imposed field increased by 60% when Ni was introduced to > the > imposed field. > > Have I misunderstood the DGT report? > > > > >Like you, any one of us can only do so much of what is required. To come > >up with an all inclusive theory, we must trust the word and the work done > >by others. > > > >I must admit that I trust DGT. So far, their experimental observation > about > >magnetic field strength has no impact on the theory (HEMI) that they put > >forward. > > > >They have no theroritical based interest in misleading us to advance their > >theory base on Dr. Kims work. > > > >Like us, DGT is simply amazed at the magnetic nature of their experimental > >find but have not connected it to HEMI in any way. This is hard to > >understand. > > > >On the part of DGT, there is no self interest in tossing an almost > >unbelievable finding into their finding and in fact this finding undercuts > >HEMI. > > > >In fact such a finding is a major distraction. They really need to do a > >major rethink of their experimental position on HEMI and BEC as per Dr. > Kim. > > > > > >On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Edmund Storms <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> > >> On Mar 2, 2014, at 10:47 AM, Axil Axil wrote: > >> > >> > These Nanoplasmonic experiments with uranium can be done > inexpensively, > >> why can't Ed replicate these experiments? > >> > >> Because I have only two hands and no financial support. If you want > this > >> replicated, I suggest you hire someone to do this. > >> > >> Ed Storms > >> > >> > >> > >> > Regards, > > Robin van Spaandonk > > http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html > >
